Lawmaker Proposes Implanting Microchips in People to Track Non-Violent Offenders Like “Pets”

in #news6 years ago

 Toledo, Ohio – This Tuesday, Toledo City Councilman Rob Ludeman  suggested that criminals be implanted with microchips so they can be  tracked by police and the courts. Ludeman also made comments essentially  describing people charged with crimes as animals. 

The councilman said, this can’t be inhumane because we do it to our pets.” Ludeman suggested that implantable microchips should be used instead  of ankle bracelets for people doing time on house arrest because ankle  bracelets don’t work on the cop shows that he watches.  

“I’ve seen enough shows on TV where the individual has slipped  it off and they’ll go commit a crime and slip it back on. I can’t  believe it’s an inhumane thing and I’ve got to believe the technology is  there. We microchip our dogs, cats, there’s got to be a way that you  can put a microchip in and it can’t be removed until their sentence is  served or probation is over,” Ludeman said, according to the Toledo Blade

Luckily, other members of the city council did not immediately jump  on board with the plan, but they weren’t extremely repulsed or offended  by it either. “It’s something I’d have to look into. We don’t want to be Big  Brother. What we want to do is make sure people are where they say  they’re going to be,” Councilman Gary Johnson said.

 Councilman Nick Komives defended Ludeman, saying that he did not  intend for his comments to be harmful. Komives went on to say that there  are “probably” ethical problems with implanting microchips into  prisoners and parolees. “As a concept, I am not particularly in favor of microchipping  human beings. We might find it humane for dogs because they run off, but  I think there are probably a lot of moral and ethical questions that  would come to mind when thinking of microchipping humans.,” Komives said. 

According to Deputy Court Administrator Burma Stewart, electronic  monitoring is used on an increasing number of people, but the vast  majority of them are non-violent offenders. Stewart also said that there  have only been two attempted escapes in the past year and both of them  were quickly apprehended. Councilman Tom Waniewski seemed to be in favor of these types of  measures to prevent drug dealers from making sales while on house  arrest.

 “They’re getting to the point where they are thumbing their noses  at us. The police do too hard of a job to have them back in the  community. It’s not fair to the residents. Boy, if there was a way that  these ankle bracelets could do more than just monitor, I’d ask you to  order a couple dozen more,” he said. 

The fact that RFID chips have been known to cause cancer when implanted in humans was not brought up at the meeting. According to research  funded by the National Institute of Justice, prisoners who are released  with electronic monitoring have a far lower recidivism rate than those  who stay in jail for their full sentence. 

There seems to be a fair amount of pushback that will hopefully  prevent this from becoming a reality in Ohio anytime soon, but the fact  that this even a conversation taking place at city council meetings is  extremely alarming. In 2004, the FDA approved the implantation of RFID microchips in  humans, and while they are not widely used, there has been talk of them  being used on soldiers, and one company in Wisconsin is forcing their employees to get chipped in order to access company computers and fulfill daily activities. 

Video 

Sort:  

I wouldn't worry too much about anything a single Toledo, Ohio city councilman has to say.

I can see both sides of it. On one hand it can give a better control. On the other 'big brother' has more control. We could all be tattooed with bar codes. I think the ankle monitors should zap them if they're 'out of their area' Yet with the chip...can potentially do the same thing. Put them to sleep untl the police show up.

Yet, if you were chipped you wouldn't have to carry a wallet or purse. In order for someone to rob you they would have to chop off your hand or cut out the implant, which would carry a more serious crime. I kind of see more victims. Until it's completely safe...no bueno. One's imaginiation could really run away with this.

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

The reason why implanted microchips hype went away is that it really does cause cancer, and in such a way as THAT microchip is the cause of it.

It is also apparent from this, that those in charge feel that everything could be made better if we were just able to control everyone's actions.
We just have to use more carrot and more STICK! And then things are all better.

Too bad these politicians are never about increasing the economy, or allowing people to make a living, or being self-sufficient. Those would cure crime. But, they are in it for the payoffs, and to impose codes to help out their business buddies.

I am technically against this but wouldn't be opposed to doing something like that to pedophiles and violent criminals.