from that interview in hindsight I think its easy to say "I told you so" but if I were to get informed from this interview for the first time without knowing what would happen for the next decade in syria I would have thought cooper was the more reliable source. he did not explain why all of the sudden these terrorists sprung up 10 years after iraq, and when he said they were "protecting" reporters it sounded like they actually were prevented to do their job...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Foreign reporters in Syria were part of the US tools in its war against our country, from day one for each honest reporter there were dozens of others reporting only lies, there's the famous story of the CNN reporter, cameraman and technician working with a terrorist group to destroy the gas pipeline in Homs, and that was from the early days and they reported it was destroyed by the Syrian army except they were exposed because they forgot their camera on all night long broadcasting to their head office in the USA and it was caught by our intelligence. Others 'embedded' with the 'rebels' were reporting complete lies and when their death was more useful for the terrorists than their reports they killed them to blame the Syrian army as well, many of these crimes are exposed already. So much lies were told and the non Syrian reporters were not innocent at all.
but if you told me that 10 years ago i would have laughed at you