Following on from my previous post relating to the NZ shooting event in Christchurch, in which it was shown that a (heavily censored) specialist in occult numerical studies predicted the date of the attack in NZ months in advance... Now we have a well known political intel specialist stating that the shooter was, at least, possibly known to some 'secret services' in advance.
Tarrant is seen on a Turkish airport CCTV camera: Source: Daily Mail
As with many of these investigations, early data can be hard to corroborate, but Sibel Edmonds (founder of independent news platform 'Newsbud') has a pretty good track record and deserves to be heard. She states in today's video that Tarrant, the shooter in NZ was in Turkey twice and during both visits a terrorist event took place there. As I understand, she is saying that in both cases, the German embassy was shut down in advance, citing ISIS terror threats, and was nearby to the events that transpired. Sibel states that her research shows that these two events are the only examples she could find of the German embassy being shut down there in this way - so Tarrant just happened to visit Turkey on both rare occasions at exactly the same time! hmm...
This raises the question of how well known Tarrant was/is and whether he may have even been working with German secret services or groups in Germany. There are many possibilities here - ranging from the neutral to the highly disturbing and complex:
- The German secret services could just be particularly good at monitoring communications and picking up that something was going to happen in advance. Even though apparently other governments didn't and none of them mentioned that Tarrant was being monitored.
- Tarrant could have been working with groups in Germany who were involved in arranging the attacks in Turkey. Suggesting that his claim of being a 'white power' terrorist is false or misleading - in order to cover his real status and objective.
- Tarrant is some kind of magical magnet for terrorism.
- Completely random coincidence that is highly statistically unlikely - but technically not impossible.
Given that we already know that the number codes relating to this event are suspicious and that these codes can be found in terror events that are allegedly caused by a wide variety of groups.. I have to wonder, as many others are, just how true the stories of most of these events are. As a free thinker, I have to allow the possibility that many of these events are being orchestrated, perhaps using advanced mind control (such as the type that might have evolved following on from the acknowledged joint Nazi/US research program into trauma based mind control - MK Ultra) to further a more complex agenda behind the scenes. Manipulating the mass consciousness for persronal gain is the ultimate power move. As I have covered previously, numerous whistleblowers have attested to how ISIS is a creation of western secret services and governments and in particular, the US Army's Scott Bennett has been particularly vocal in identifying the methods that the CIA uses to find ISIS via swiss banks directly.
Many theories are being spread about what is really going on here - including blaming Israel and America for a continued war on the psychology of the planet in order to further their own agendas. I don't know the full truth of this, but it absolutely behooves us to keep an eye on it all and not just believe what we are fed. You wouldn't trust a mass murderer to tell you the truth, I imagine - so why do it here?
Wishing you well,
Ura Soul
Vote @ura-soul for Steem Witness!
(Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Steem Blockchain.
Without witnesses there is no Steem, Steemit, DTube, Utopian or
Busy... You can really help Steem by making your 30 witness votes count!)
I think it is quite important to consider how New Zealand is attempting to censor their own people in the aftermath of this event. Numerous inconsistencies and misrepresentations exist in the 'official narrative' that is being pushed by the enemedia. When censorship is the response to inquiry into the facts, it is clear that the facts are contrary to the official narrative.
I can think of only one valid reason why inquiry into facts could be contrary to their narrative, and if that is the case, New Zealand not only better NOT turn in their weapons and submit to disarmament, they better get more and organize resistance to their own government before it executes even worse false flag terrorism on them.
Thanks!
Worse than New Zealand is the global efforts of the FANG to suppress these videos world wide. I don't recall a time before when there were such efforts to suppress a video, what are they afraid we will see?
FANG is Fakebook, Apple, Netflix, and Goolag? This is uncharted territory in my living memory as well, but I did not live in the Soviet Union at Stalin's heyday, so must acknowledge my lack of total information awareness. What I note is that the worse the censorship, the weaker the position of the censors. After all, if your position was borne out by facts, you'd let people ascertain that, wouldn't you?
There are details of the attack that inure suspicion to the government of New Zealand itself. There was - as is so often the case with terrorist attacks Western governments seek to use for propaganda and political purposes - an ongoing anti-terrorist drill when the attack began, and fully kitted out, armed, and available police forces were less than 5 minutes from the mosque. Emergency calls were received as soon as the attack began. Police began to arrive at the event a half hour later. Why did they stand down while 50 people were killed?
But IMHO this isn't the main reason for their insistence on censoring the video. The video was livestreamed on Fakebook during the attack, and 17 minutes of copyrighted music along with almost 50 murders played live. No consideration was given to censoring Fakebook. The alleged terrorist had posted previously on 8chan, warning people of his intentions. NZ has blocked access to 8chan, 4chan, liveleaks, and other news sites where freedom of speech figures prominently.
NZ is blocking access to sites where it's citizens might be availed of information regarding existential threats, places where they could discuss freely what actions they could undertake to prepare to survive those threats, and places where the corruption of government and collusion it undertakes with other corrupt governments, agencies, and institutions is revealed.
They're not protecting Kiwis. They're protecting their own corruption, murderous intent, and making it possible to grease the skids of the retaliatory attacks outraged Muslims will undertake, and soon.
This is an existential threat to every man, woman, and child in New Zealand, and Arden is signing death warrants with the censor's pen as we speak. In the next attack Kiwis will be more vulnerable because of the specific actions she has taken, not least demanding they turn in those weapons that would best enable them to defend against the attack that is surely coming from ISIS, or it's ilk. People are going to die because they have no weapons to defend themselves with.
The censorship will keep them from finding out that terrorists are bragging about the attacks they're going to execute.
That's what the censorship is all about. It's going to make NZ scream in agony, and then the NZ government will demand more power, more money, and more obedience to protect them, all while planning how to make them scream louder.
Welcome back, BTW. How's things?
-yes
-I would, and yet instead of doing that the NZ government banned guns within a week.
-I assume because then needed a higher death toll. And if I was a cop you wouldn't see me run into someplace with a guy inside shooting everyone. Sounds dangerous, better set up a perimeter, call for backup.
There's something to be said for backup, but I wouldn't wait around for it in that situation. Scott Israel made his deputies stand down, and kids died. I'd rather die than kids.
I'm plugging along, making waves, and surfing the consequences.
There are probably a lot of reasons that it is probably better that I am not a cop.
That there was more than one shooter, as per the early reports. They keep banging on about T. because they want to push their "white supremacist" narrative as an excuse for more censorship on socmed of dissenting opinions. Also conveniently dog whistles ppl to hate Trump supporters (who they have always tried to paint as WS) and the right in general. Who doesn't hate a WS right? This snags in many non-partisans as well. What has this platform been like for censorship on this topic?
In general this platform has little censorship, it's a great place to find conspiracy theories of all types.
Yes. I have been shadow banned on Twitter for tweeting articles about Tarrant being in Turkey, & other places. There was also an excellent thread by journ Nick Monroe, which I was sharing talking about the heavy censorship, inc. NZ being cut of from some websites. The reaction by the corporate media and politicians seems staged, and the fact no one is seriously questioning how the intel agencies could have missed this is telling. This is all about censorship, stirring hatred between the "left" and the "right" (sorry to use labels - I don't approve of them but for brevity's sake), possibly to the point of starting a civil war. Then they could impose martial law, and the journey to "1984" will be complete.
The Hegelian Dialectic is used at every level to corral people into useful herds from which profiteers can extract rent. Christian vs. Muslim, Left vs. Right, White vs. Black, and so on. We are ubiquitously prepared from our earliest youth to be susceptible to these memes, and to be useful as cattle, or cannon fodder, to the limits of our lives and treasure.
One of the most glaring reasons revealing this event as a false flag is this ongoing censorship of the event. Nothing can more render people vulnerable to harm than censorship, as only factual information can enable people to secure themselves from attack from any source. Exacerbating that blindness by stripping people of their personal arms further demonstrates that the sociopaths intent on profiting by every means from our lives and treasure are almost certainly planning to execute more terrorist attacks, and very soon, from the expected date of the disarming of Kiwis.
Censorship and disarmament of people is an existential threat that directly makes them vulnerable to terrorism. The people of New Zealand hopefully realize this, and are taking effective action to provide their security from the government of New Zealand. The information I have indicates that sales of weapons, ammunition, VPNs, and every means of doing so is being undertaken by Kiwis as a whole.
Those few that are incapable of grasping their precarious vulnerability may not be able to be protected by their fellows, despite their every effort to prepare for the coming attacks. Sadly, evolutionary pressures remain real and operative today, just as they always have.
Thanks!
I don't generally watch mainstream news so don't always pick up on all the details of the situation unless I deliberately focus on it. What censorship has taken place other than them banning the live stream video of the event?
Now they're banning Jordan Peterson's '12 Rules for Life'. They've blocked the chans, liveleaks, and other free speech promoting sites. The attack was livestreamed on Fakebook, but there's been not a peep about blocking that, or Youtool, where many copies have been posted.
It's obvious they're not even concerned about the actual content they're claiming to be 'protecting' Kiwis from, but using this as an excuse to purge NZ internet of non-liberal content and oppress dissent at home. They've arrested several people for sharing banned speech and are prosecuting them with threats of 10 or more years in prison, including a 14 year old child.
Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not an instruction manual for NZ. Kiwis are going to die as a result of their firearms being seized (it is notable that the attack at the second mosque is reported to have been curtailed by a civilian with and empty firearm) and the censorship which will prevent them from understanding threats to their security.
As synchronicity would have it, I watched a recent interview with Peterson a few days ago where he was asked, essentially, how he saw the future going - given his success.. He replied that he figured it would all end pretty soon due to him saying something dumb.
I am aware of that video, yes - I have seen it before. I am not saying to blindly trust her, or anyone. In the case of my post here, the facts can be checked independently.
Such censorship speaks volumes!
I am curious... why you decided to censor everything?
Operation Gladio Returns...NATO Secret Army
Thanks for the update @ura-soul. Many of us have our eyes on the things effecting us the most or things that are local to us. Glad to see you stepping up to throw light onto this situation. I'm always suspicious when things like this happen and the way it was allowed to spread worldwide over the internet just raised huge red flags with me. Someone wanted this to be seen and they want us to be in fear/anger. Until one of these "Terrorist" targets a politician or Royalty, I'll choose to believe it's just another false flag event.
Thanks again for sharing the info
You are welcome. This particular one is different in that there is a large document allegedly outlining the shooter's beliefs and intentions - which include the deliberate spreading of the information far and wide to allegedly trigger a war. I just aim to keep an open mind so as to notice as much as possible and not be misled. Peace!
Interesting. I checked the two articles and the dates.
Remains a little bit the question where she got from that it were the only closures since 2012 but this is certainly possible too.
She is very connected in the intelligence community, but I don't know either.
A very sad inncident in which the terorist shot down brutally innocent muslims while they are performing their religious activities in masjid. SHAMEFUL۔
I hope that it is not a prelude to a more ugly chaos or plan as I see it @ura-soul
Unfortunately, we have a lot of healing to do before such violence ends, but we will get there. <3
It was a hoax... who cares who Tarrant is (or isnt')... no one actually shot anyone with real bullets.
That is the SINGLE most important factor... this was a faked shooting.
(EDIT: let me add, that any supposed "journalist" who speaks about the shooting as if it's part of some greater plot or scheme without mentioning it was fake is simply spinning more garbage and only serves to confuse things (probably at the behest of a "handler").
It's a FAKE false flag "production," that's the ONLY talking point.)
I am open to any possibility, but I need to see evidence before I draw any conclusions. I have seen people attempt to put forward evidence of fakery, but to me it is low quality at best so far.
There’s some interesting videos here claiming hoax https://153news.net/videos.php
Curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)
Latest Drive For Delegation/Fundraising Click Here!!!
Ways you can help the @informationwar!
Hi @ura-soul!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.970 which ranks you at #92 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 215 contributions, your post is ranked at #24.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
huh?
Your article suggested that the Germans are either aware or in cahoots with the shooter here. If you are not a Chappelle fan the reference may be hard to explain.
Fair enough, I don't watch TV.
If you can find it online its worth a stream, one of the funniest shows ever made.