Two weeks ago tomorrow I was confronted by an armed assailant. Folks visiting family dissuaded the assailant from executing an attack, multiple personal surveillance systems captured the confrontation, and satisfied the landlady that the assailant needed to be banned from the park.
Government did not become involved at all, and no muck were injured in the preservation of my life and all our freedom. I submit you dramatically underestimate free men.
Here, in Pacific City, we are already making the transition from 'muck' to sovereign and independent people. I am confident this is happening all over the world, and is not confined to my little village.
I dispute your speculations based on my experience, and am glad my own life is a testament to the beneficence of freedom to members of society.
What you describe is nothing more than fragmented tribalism, under which system, personal/family vendettas continue on for generations. The so-called "freedom" illustrated above results in nothing more than fractured humanity living in tribal isolation. African tribalism has resulted in the mismanagement of once prosperous regions of that unfortunate continent; how can such future be ever preferable to the current nation-state institutional system that has provided security and luxury for its subjects?
From whence does your "landlady" derive the privilege of disbursing "her" property, if not from the state/crown? Without the state/crown to enforce and legitimize property "rights," there can not even be such concept as "private property." Can a man claim "rights" to earth that he did not create, resources that he did not embed, creatures that he did not quicken? Without the power of the state/crown to enforce its arbitrary legal matrix of property disbursement, no man has any legitimacy to any property. Men ought to give credit where it is due, and dues when it is demanded.
You either fail to grasp what I report, or misconstrue it. The relationships treated aren't familial, tribal, or political. The results are simply natural consequences of nascent technological development empowering individuals to protect themselves from oppression, and demonstrate the fallacy of your subsequent commentary.
I hope that minor correction dispels your misapprehension.
Thanks!