There's no conclusive link between vaccines and autism. There is however a link between autism and children who live in heavily industrialized areas. A study was done out in California in a heavily industrialized area after many children living around the area developed autism. The conclusion was that where a child lived may play a role in the development of autism.
Another key note I took of this study was home schooled vs non home schooled children. There's a economic factor that would lay heavy among that analysis which I don't see displayed here. Home schooled children are more prone to come from middle to higher income better educated households who don't live in heavily industrialized or older housing where lead and older industrialized area's were once common.
Then there's also no mention of the role that plastics has played since the increase of autism cases. There's quite a bit of evidence coming forth showing that infertility among younger adults today may be linked to the heavy use of plastics in todays society. There are more than likely many other links to health issues when it comes to plastics but plastics are made from oil and linked to millions of jobs globally....that's the real precursor as to why no one's willing to look into the adverse health issues faced by many people today. If you want to find a true culprit to blame vaccines, in my opinion, would be low man on the totem pole compared to the use of plastics that are in virtually everything we touch now a days. It isn't even everything we touch either it's what's inhaled out into the air. Many of our clothes are now made with synthetic plastics, these micro particles are washed off into our waterways and blown off into the air from drying our clothes....there's a much more reasonable reason to believe that if there is more allergies and asthma now a days that it once again would stand a greater chance to be linked to plastics than any vaccine.
I think people who don't want to vaccinate themselves or their children will have their reasons. Saying no to something you don't agree with seems legitimate to me, and in principle saying no would be enough without giving any further reasons. Often we don't know how to explicitly say the reasons ourselves, we have different thoughts and arguments at different times and it is difficult to give a single reason.
Unfortunately, the 'no' is not accepted by others, especially in relation to vaccination. So we look for arguments to support or reinforce our own rejection. Since it has become customary nowadays to use scientific papers for this purpose, this is what they do. In science, both positions can always be found.
To position oneself as a critic of vaccination is not only not socially acceptable, it threatens to become a taboo subject. I think you might agree that truth is not to be found per se in the majority. So I think it's important to recognise that the widespread support for vaccination is not solely due to the belief that it will work, but that the danger of being ostracised as a refuser and becoming socially unacceptable is a very real danger.
From my point of view, the ostracism and exclusion of vaccination sceptics is illogical, because those who are themselves convinced of vaccination can have themselves vaccinated and can henceforth be relaxed about those who do not. So where is the problem?
You would think right?....but the problem is that the media, doctors and the CDC are busy telling people that the non vaccinated are the ones spreading covid that are creating the break through cases. That isn't the reality of it in places like Israel who have vaccinated a majority of their people but it's the vast majority of the vaccinated who are spreading it. There was never any chance what so ever that vaccinating during a pandemic would stop the spread of covid because you could never vaccinate everyone at the same time. Many people were bound to give covid to vaccinated individuals. Where the big ouch comes in is that people actually believe that if the non vaccinated would go get vaccinated these break through cases would stop....but it's gone beyond that now, they don't understand that covid is more rampant among the vaccinated now then the non vaccinated because their are more vaccinated then non vaccinated people, it's a sixty to forty percentage with the non vaccinated being the later, it's just the CDC hiding the number of vaccinated people getting covid by not requiring the reporting of them unless hospitalized or death occurs. What I find even more shocking is that people actually think they have immunity from covid if they are vaccinated. There was an article here the other day where a hospital is going to require everyone working there to get vaccinated, you'd been surprised at the number of comments from people commenting they don't want to go see their doctor or nurse who hasn't taken the necessary steps like themselves to protect the public.....there is no protect the public, that horse went out the barn door weeks ago.
There is no logic in all this if you ask me. Contradictions at every turn.
Personally, I have a relaxed view of diseases that are attributed to "viruses". I've spent long enough on the subject, it would go too far to put it in the answer here. But have a look at @active-truth 's blog, there you will find largely mirrored what I myself think about this matter (or check my blog where I here and there touch it).
Simultaneity, I agree, is impossible to achieve anyway, and certainly not if you want to force it. With such a strong intrusion into the lives of individuals, resistance is not only acceptable but also provoked. After all, it would be a complete illusion to assume that all people are equally committed to a single story and behave "like one man".
Greetings to you.
Plastics may well be unhealthy, but your attempt to ignore vaccines and focus on plastic is extreme cognitive dissonance bordering on delusional... One day you will have to grasp what is going on here! Or not...
This is an old picture - make that one in 50 for American children
Just to show you how easy it is to take a time frame of a development and attach it to a scientific finding of distinction and make a meme of it, I went and looked up the history of autism. It's been around since before the mid 1700's. As with most medical discoveries there wasn't always a correlation to a cause. That's been true of many mental and neurological disorders as scientist/psychiatrist and others have sorted them out throughout the years. Just because a distinction became more clear in 1943 that autism became dislodged from schizophrenia and given it's medical terminology as a classified distinction does not mean it developed as a result of vaccines, it was always there throughout history but it took years to define it into it's own category unrelated to other mental disorders.
What you and many others try and do is make a correlation to something that isn't true to fit an agenda. Science is advanced enough on the issues to know it's gene related and how those genes react in certain environments that trigger it. You simply cannot continue to ignore developing science. You may be able to further propagate your theories if it wasn't for the fact that autism is being proven to be more prevalent in areas where children live in heavily industrialized areas. The fact autism has grown over the years is because the population has grown. That would also rationalize why the Amish don't have the same problem with autism as the general population, they don't live in heavily industrialized areas.
Anybody could play your unscientific game and take any disease discovered (or defined) during the first few years of vaccine develop and blame it on vaccines then proceed to spend years making meme's and defending your view points based on them.
There is not much point arguing with vaxers or any other variety of mind programmed believers, so there is also no point in getting into why germ theory is bullshit, or why gene theory is bullshit too, but I'll just keep posting information for people who are ready for it and stick to memes for replying!
x
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2015/10/03/no-more-monkeying-around-about-vaccines-and-autism/?sh=306447eba667
http://www.thinkingautismguide.com/2012/05/whacking-monkeys-in-name-of-science.html