The challenge is that manual curation is a complete waste of time. What is the value to the curator? Nothing but time lost and maybe a few cents gained in curation rewards.
It's a losing game.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The challenge is that manual curation is a complete waste of time. What is the value to the curator? Nothing but time lost and maybe a few cents gained in curation rewards.
It's a losing game.
Also, is it beneficial to pass off the act of curation to investors? They get an investment...and a job?...probably one in which the have no interest at that. It doesn't really make sense when you think about it. I wonder how we could change that?
That's a very good question. Investors and users do not need to be the same and many times probably are not in this case.
50% curation rewards. 50% author rewards.
The people who are self voting are already earning on that model.
We don't want the rich to get richer, so everyone should get poorer?