They are simply making things loose their meanings. They are making truth flexible. The only time the media really throw a fit is when a 20 something has sex with a highschooler. When some degenerate scum are talking about being sexually attracted to sexually under-developed or undeveloped children, it's just a part of a spectrum. Soon schizophrenia will be called a different interpretation of reality and people will say "I can't help what I think of as truth. You can't blame me for saying war is peace. It's just my reality"
If these people already understand sexual contact with sexually underdeveloped children is wrong, then they just need to get help. Next potential serial killers will be saying: I know killing is wrong but I can't stop thinking about it.
I always use the re-emergence of obsolete terminology, the invention of new words and acronyms as the warning sign.
When someone is pushing new language, they are trying to assert dominance as the only ones who truly understand this new language.
This is actually very true. It still depends on the topic. Science may need new words. Even sociology may need new words. Check out "Stand Alone Complex" for an example. But those come out of necessity for communication. When left (or even some of the right) does it, it's used as a perversion of communication.
You may find these 2 links interesting: https://steemit.com/economy/@vimukthi/understanding-the-mechanisms-of-commie-madness-and-a-clever-list-of-incredible-facts-to-disarm-socialist-propaganda-while
https://steemit.com/philosophy/@vimukthi/chintana-the-socio-psychological-force-that-guide-the-fate-of-nations-cultures-and-all-sorts-of-groups-an-explanation-of-the
Read the first one. Loved it!
Thank you.