I've had a lot of fun (and learned a lot) from the ancom vs. ancap debates here on Steemit and elsewhere. It's interesting how much words trip us up when often we all want the same things: freedom, autonomy, peace, resources to live and thrive, and fulfillment in life. If we can get the first part right ("no rulers"), then the details of how we get the rest will hopefully be pretty easy, especially if we give each other the freedom and space to take different approaches based on the preferences of the people we choose to associate with. For me, non-violent, voluntary interactions are the key.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yep, once rule by force is off the table we can get on to how we want to do things collectively.
Do we want to gouge our neighbors because they can't mow their own lawns, or plumb a house, or do we want to help our neighbors because it is the right thing to do.
Do we want to continue to concentrate wealth in the hands of those few that do the least work, or do we want to spread the wealth more equitably among those that do do the work?
Do we put personal wealth ahead of everything else, or do we make wealth no longer a thing?
I'm hoping that we just keep working, but stop paying.
This seems the shortest route to the stars to me.