You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Bill and Melinda Gates Annual Letter for 2017

in #philanthropy8 years ago
  • First link:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/kenyan-gvmt-launches-probe-into-claim-un-is-using-vaccines-for-mass-sterili which says:http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/tetanus.asp Many link to the same source (LifeSiteNews) but few link to their follow up here:

The Health Ministry submitted its test results on the tetanus vaccine to the committee last week, showing no trace of HCG.

As the Snopes article explains, women who got the vaccine had children. So... yeah. Great thing about falsifiable claims is, once they are falsified, we can move on. Also, no mention of Bill Gates' work unless he is behind the WHO?

  • Second link:

On top of it all, less than one percent of children with wild polio are likely to become paralyzed in the first place, so why all the concern and commitment by one Bill Gates?

That is directly answer by this year's letter.

Bill Microsoft Gates wants to get rid of one billion people – one of three ways

By saving 122 million people? Again, read the letter. Birth rates do go down when women can control whether or not they want to have the child which directly leads to getting whole areas out of poverty, decreasing infant mortality, and a whole host of other tragic results in society. The letter explains this well if you read it with an open mind instead of a pre-confirmed conspiracy theory.

I'm still not seeing a "a trail of destruction" here.

  • Third Link:

We probably agree that most formal education systems are failures. My favorite book on that is Free to Learn by Peter Gray. I'm not yet convinced attempts to support education systems is a "trail of destruction" but in this case, maybe we agree. I wouldn't single out the Gates foundation, however, as most governments on the planet do this, yes? I was homeschooled, I homeschool my children, and I'm learning more about unschooling all the time. I'll watch this whole thing later, but skimming the show notes didn't seem like a very good justification for vilifying them, IMO.