My best guess for the pointless bridges is that someone pitched an art idea to city council, and they decided they needed to be progressive and spend a bunch of taxpayer money on pointless art shit.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My best guess for the pointless bridges is that someone pitched an art idea to city council, and they decided they needed to be progressive and spend a bunch of taxpayer money on pointless art shit.
lmao my roommate said the same thing
There's an ugly art installation outside one of the libraries in our district, and I'm pretty sure the only people who embraced the design were the tax feeders who bought it.
Reminded me of this "art" installation in a park back in Finland, I heard they'd pay €25k for it:
It didn't even make much sense with the park, kids could go up its tail and slide down its tongue so there was some practicality to it at least but man the person who built that must've laughed all the way to the bank.
I need to learn how to be a pretentious artist so I can hoodwink some city fathers out of beaucoup bucks.