- I didn't see it that way at first sight, maybe I need to revisit his deleted video which is still online on a couple of YouTube channels. I mostly care about myself trying to be 100% factually honest when talking about pizzagate, I don't really care if others are not completely accurate when making posts, comments, videos, etc. Of course, like everybody else I will argue, help to correct or provide missing info if I have it, but I wouldn't call another researcher fake or shill, unless to my eye that person is without a doubt being dishonest, then I would probably point to the inaccuracy of the info not to the motivations of the person behind it (which could be obvious to everybody anyway if money is involved). I don't feel he's the Alex Jones serial sensationalist-selling type worthy of being exposed, and was mostly happy that he provided the brick digging room piece of the puzzle. I see myself more of a detective than an activist.
- Yes, I know now, reallygraceful has done a video about this. Again I would need to watch for the second time his computer screen video to see if there is not some element that I've missed that would prove things one way or the other.
- Thought you meant the Facebook page, not the Messenger exchange. It's a misunderstanding.
- This is information I cannot judge by myself.
- Then I agree.
No, I think you're right. It's only one way out of many to interpret it all, the texting exchanges doesn't proove threats. I believe the police would need the alleged phone calls to make it a case.