You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Pizzagate repo updated [Alefantis Threats/Voat-Dyncorp connection/new infographics]

in #pizzagate8 years ago
  1. I didn't say it wasn't okay to sell T-Shirts if the idea is to spread awareness. The problem I have with this dude is his click bait bullshit sensationalism and lies to sell T-Shirts. Understand the difference, I don't actively lie and say I am being threatened to draw attention to my shitty T-Shirt website.
  2. Two you simply go into the code and change www.facebook.com/xyz to www.facebook.com/jamesalefantis and anyone can appear to be James Alefantis in FB messenger, the video that for whatever reason is now gone, showed someone creating the fake Alefantis account that this O'Neil kid was claiming was threatening him.
  3. Re-see my last point, if you don't understand it, re read it again till you get it.
  4. I have not conversed with him, however I have seen a convo he had with another PizzaGate reseacher in which he refused to verify anything he is claiming.
  5. Yes, that would be the Kill Room and in that Pegasus video he never proves it is in Pegasus.

A major point you refuse to address. Is the simple fact that this kid claiming Alefantis is threatening him in writing is clearly bullshit.

Sort:  
  1. I didn't see it that way at first sight, maybe I need to revisit his deleted video which is still online on a couple of YouTube channels. I mostly care about myself trying to be 100% factually honest when talking about pizzagate, I don't really care if others are not completely accurate when making posts, comments, videos, etc. Of course, like everybody else I will argue, help to correct or provide missing info if I have it, but I wouldn't call another researcher fake or shill, unless to my eye that person is without a doubt being dishonest, then I would probably point to the inaccuracy of the info not to the motivations of the person behind it (which could be obvious to everybody anyway if money is involved). I don't feel he's the Alex Jones serial sensationalist-selling type worthy of being exposed, and was mostly happy that he provided the brick digging room piece of the puzzle. I see myself more of a detective than an activist.
  2. Yes, I know now, reallygraceful has done a video about this. Again I would need to watch for the second time his computer screen video to see if there is not some element that I've missed that would prove things one way or the other.
  3. Thought you meant the Facebook page, not the Messenger exchange. It's a misunderstanding.
  4. This is information I cannot judge by myself.
  5. Then I agree.

No, I think you're right. It's only one way out of many to interpret it all, the texting exchanges doesn't proove threats. I believe the police would need the alleged phone calls to make it a case.