Wikipedia is compromised. Its a con-man who tells the truth on the 99% of stuff which doesn't count, and tells lies on the 1% of stuff which is critically important. I didn't want to reach that conclusion, but the consistent evidence is too obvious.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So what are Roger Stone's "real" C.V? What did he "really" do so far in his life that brought media attention to his tweets?