I agree, AI detection tools are in no means perfect. And accusations of fraud should indeed be taken seriously, but they should also be accompanied by robust proof to ensure fairness and accuracy in assessing the situation. I may have been posting too frequent when I got back to this format, primarily a bit on the excited side to see an engine that superseded Steemit, now I am at one to two posts a day, a personal goal is one to release some of my ideas and share what I feel is helpful information in a technology era. I appreciate HW's service to this platform although reading through their content they should use some tools to spell check before outputting onto the platform :) my opinion...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think that if you add a line to say what tools you used then it is up to others to judge the value of the content. Of course the auto-voters won't care.
I tend not to post more than once per day on average. I just don't have enough ideas for more and I want each post to have some value.
Yes I tend to agree with you about a disclaimer revealing tools and assistance if any, that will be next on my list to add to my content. I appreciate your support throughout our time on Steemit and Hive, you're awesome!
I support the stuff I like :) I've had issues with HW driving people away. There are some dodgy accounts here, but some just slip up.
All societies require policing to keep bad actors in check.