The 'AI' detection tools may well be imperfect. Any accusations of fraud need to be backed up with proof. Given that the AI text generators are trained on human-created texts they may be hard to tell from the real thing. I see you had a few warnings. I don't think such accusations justify downvotes on all posts. I wonder if someone thinks you are posting too often to be coming up with original content yourself. HW need to be transparent in their methods.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree, AI detection tools are in no means perfect. And accusations of fraud should indeed be taken seriously, but they should also be accompanied by robust proof to ensure fairness and accuracy in assessing the situation. I may have been posting too frequent when I got back to this format, primarily a bit on the excited side to see an engine that superseded Steemit, now I am at one to two posts a day, a personal goal is one to release some of my ideas and share what I feel is helpful information in a technology era. I appreciate HW's service to this platform although reading through their content they should use some tools to spell check before outputting onto the platform :) my opinion...
I think that if you add a line to say what tools you used then it is up to others to judge the value of the content. Of course the auto-voters won't care.
I tend not to post more than once per day on average. I just don't have enough ideas for more and I want each post to have some value.
Yes I tend to agree with you about a disclaimer revealing tools and assistance if any, that will be next on my list to add to my content. I appreciate your support throughout our time on Steemit and Hive, you're awesome!
I support the stuff I like :) I've had issues with HW driving people away. There are some dodgy accounts here, but some just slip up.
All societies require policing to keep bad actors in check.