Perhaps she is trying say we do not need anything to come between us, the Sun, and Flowers. But then again, it could just be she felt more comfortable doing it that way. I am not much of an Art Critic, and many times Art flies way over my head. But her poetry, or what I have been fortunate to hear because of following @mammasitta, I find I like. So in the end she could just simply be saying the clothes do not make the person, the message makes the person.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I doubt that.. her poems are erotic..and she is probably using sex appeal strategy for promotion by posing her naked back to the camera..perhaps she is a pervert
Seems, except for the end of your comment you have answered yourself, "her poems are erotic..and she is probably using sex appeal strategy for promotion" I do not get how this has anything at all to do her being "a perhaps pervert". If a naked back is an indication of a perversion, then I guess all those people that go to the beach or swimming pool and expose their backs are "perverts". I just do not get it, and don't even want to try to understand how you can see her picture as a perversion.
poets should do poetry..no need to become a pornstar