anarchy is a vertical structure of society with a lack of unjustified hierarchy
It is often decentralized as that is the easiest way to keep the power in the hands of the workers
so basically communism
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
communism, according to Marx and Lenin, is a very centralized organization. it can be democratic or not, but centralized anyway.
thats a transitional state not communism
(hint the transitional state was their idea of how to achieve communism with limited tech...... today we have the tech and the transitional state is not needed, according to marx and lenin your a dumbass )
the definition of communism is literally the lack of unjustified hierarchies lmao
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Wage_Labour_and_Capital.pdf https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
you might want to read up on what communism is by actual communists before you say something next time
Is "irony" the right word to use, here.
I think you meant to say "you're"...?
Sorry, I can't help but point out the "your an idiot" comments - call it a weakness, if it helps you to cope.
this speaks for itself
"hahaha its the internet and nobody uses grammar..... but if I point out his I win the argument and my retarded political ideology works"
People are less likely to give credence to those who use poor grammar. I'm not saying this applies to you, but it's a useful and usually reliable indicator of intelligence, or lack thereof.
And, when you're trying to win an argument in the eyes of others, perception of one's credibility/ intelligence (associated with comprehension of the topic) is paramount... that's all I'm saying.
Perhaps you don't care if other people think that you know what you're talking about and I'm cool with that.
In any case, "your an idiot" comments always cause me to chuckle.
congrats
you have used the:
Style Over Substance
logical fallacy
you are a retard
have a nice day
Call it whatever you want. If you put your argument forward at an elementary school grammar level, people will tend not to buy it, whether the "substance" is right or not.
Why be lazy with presentation? If the point is to get the other person to see the truth, then why not use convincing language?
This isn't style over substance. This is logic.
Sorry, sometimes I don't recognize trolls.
what do you mean by that......
are you telling me you let anti-communists define communism for you?