it sounds odd to see the traditional dichotomy between anarchy and statalism changed in "centralization"/"decentralization". It looks like a not proper change of words. The couple "centralization"/"decentralization" indicate different kinds of artificial organization, not a choice between organized/not-organized society. I mean, I think some anarchists wouldn't like a decentralized structure of society.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
anarchy is a vertical structure of society with a lack of unjustified hierarchy
It is often decentralized as that is the easiest way to keep the power in the hands of the workers
so basically communism
communism, according to Marx and Lenin, is a very centralized organization. it can be democratic or not, but centralized anyway.
thats a transitional state not communism
(hint the transitional state was their idea of how to achieve communism with limited tech...... today we have the tech and the transitional state is not needed, according to marx and lenin your a dumbass )
the definition of communism is literally the lack of unjustified hierarchies lmao
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Wage_Labour_and_Capital.pdf https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
you might want to read up on what communism is by actual communists before you say something next time
Is "irony" the right word to use, here.
I think you meant to say "you're"...?
Sorry, I can't help but point out the "your an idiot" comments - call it a weakness, if it helps you to cope.
this speaks for itself
"hahaha its the internet and nobody uses grammar..... but if I point out his I win the argument and my retarded political ideology works"
People are less likely to give credence to those who use poor grammar. I'm not saying this applies to you, but it's a useful and usually reliable indicator of intelligence, or lack thereof.
And, when you're trying to win an argument in the eyes of others, perception of one's credibility/ intelligence (associated with comprehension of the topic) is paramount... that's all I'm saying.
Perhaps you don't care if other people think that you know what you're talking about and I'm cool with that.
In any case, "your an idiot" comments always cause me to chuckle.
congrats
you have used the:
Style Over Substance
logical fallacy
you are a retard
have a nice day
Sorry, sometimes I don't recognize trolls.
what do you mean by that......
are you telling me you let anti-communists define communism for you?
I don't know any that would prefer centralized. I do believe over time more and more people will embrace decentralized everything. I could be wrong because humans have this natural tendency to look for leadership and centralized provides that.
My perplexity is on the meaning of "decentralization". It looks ambiguous.