When it comes to forests, private land is in most case better. When no one is accountable for the consequence of their action, what you end up with is mismanagement and looting by special interest...without the incentives to maintain the capital over long period of time(because they rent the public land). When someone own the forest, if he makes an error in judgement, he devalue his property...he is the one paying the consequence.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: