So many unfounded assumptions. The reality is that there is no such thing as public wealth or public media. Claiming no bias in government news is the most hilliarious thing I have read in a while. Claiming private individuals are taking over while government spending exceeds all income from all private individuals combined is also funny.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
When it comes to forests, private land is in most case better. When no one is accountable for the consequence of their action, what you end up with is mismanagement and looting by special interest...without the incentives to maintain the capital over long period of time(because they rent the public land). When someone own the forest, if he makes an error in judgement, he devalue his property...he is the one paying the consequence.