I feel you are inflating the cases of tyranny to create a narrative of normality and you are delegitamizing the actual unspoken contracts you establish with your governing body. You are also misrepresenting the benefits you receive from this unspoken contract. You are depicting things in manners that fit only your narrow glasses so that you can sound superior and logical but you don't actually hold any validity when you introduce absurdity without foundation.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There are no contracts, spoken or unspoken. To demand compliance with arbitrary unilateral dictates through threats of violence is the root of tyranny. There is no voluntary consent, no meeting of the minds, no exchange of consideration, and thus no contract. "Social contract" theory is sophistry, plain and simple.
Thanks for validating my point. Cya