Sort:  

I was making fun of you.

...I just can't find humor in advocating the deaths of anyone, sorry.

Neither can I, that's why I think Info Wars should go away. Learn to read.

My reading ability is quite good.
Maybe you need to clarify your position better?

(Unless your are being perfectly clear with your writing, but do not like to be questioned or criticized about it?. Very Stalin-esque)

My reading ability is quite good

Unless your are being

Please, learn how to read before communicating with me again. You're clueless to the subject matter and can barely speak without invoking some communism strawman garbage that doesn't exist.

I wasn't invoking a straw man, I was comparing your perspective, regarding free speech and draconian action of quashing free speech.
Humorous comparison of principles between two individuals is not constructing as straw man argument.

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.
(wiki)

I would suggest you don't really understand what you are saying regarding straw man arguments.

I'm am not clueless to the subject matter- quite the opposite.

I am communicating with people in this discussion, not just yourself.
Unless you feel free speech is a problem..?

It's just a narcissistic personality trait to think I was only communicating with you, just for you.

No one "quashing" freeze peach, bud. I'm saying he doesn't need to be on mainstream outlets and shouldn't be. He can be fringe and cringe on his own places. He thinks preaching murder and hate is ok, and that isn't ok, and shouldn't be tolerated.

Learn to write substantively first, then maybe people would be more inclined to read what you say more carefully?