Perhaps you have mistakenly taken my comment to be narrowly focused on the specifics of this post @cyberdemon531. It isn't ...
I could elaborate, but I'm sure you and I view this very differently. Which is just fine. At least with me ...
Perhaps you have mistakenly taken my comment to be narrowly focused on the specifics of this post @cyberdemon531. It isn't ...
I could elaborate, but I'm sure you and I view this very differently. Which is just fine. At least with me ...
If you are responding positively with a post that is proven false, it makes you look silly.
You also said nothing of substance in your post, just conspiratorial vague nothings about feelings and emotions.
I'd love to debate on why you think dismantling concentration camps is a bad thing, or why healthcare for all people is a bad thing, or why saving the planet via green energy is a bad thing.
Feel free to tell me, it's not about convincing me, it's about expressing yourself coherently enough to have a chance.
Okay @cyberdemon531 ...
... I'll take another minute or two to make my point more clearly for you. I could hardly care any less about whether or not what is stated here in this post about AOC was staged or authentic.
In browsing through my feed this afternoon, I saw this post, read through it and deemed it worth a minute or two to make a much broader point about what I perceive to be the decline of our representative Republic.
Statements like this lack the civility and respect I would insist upon if we were to truly engage in any sort of "debate."
That said, I think your comment is well worded enough to provide you an upvote. The same as I do day in and day out for all those with whom I "engage" here on our Steem blockchain.
Have a good evening!
But you made no broader points? I'm not trying to be disrespectful, but when you lie or defend lies, it makes it hard to take you seriously.
You made literal substanceless statements.
huh? What was coming? What came?
huh? what does this mean? What work is needed and how aren't people doing it?
"This", this what?
This is what I'm referring to.
Okay @cyberdemon531, before calling it a day, back to responding to your last message.
Historical Context:
Meno’s Post Context:
My Response:
The last time I was actively involved, the vacancy rate was +50%. Note I did not say the incompetence / “slackadaisical” rate was +50%. Far too often, there is no one volunteering to fill these roles any more …
That’s enough out of me. Hopefully this provides you with what you perceived to be the “missing pieces” in my original response to this post.
I 100% agree with you about local level politics, I am an activist and working on expanding my reaches in my own areas.
The thing about where you're wrong is that you seem to not be familiar with AOC, or any of her freshmen colleagues. They talk policy SUBSTANCE all day long on twitter, facebook, the hill, instagram, and elsewhere, bringing those great and progressive ideas to an entire new generation of new voters. The phasing out of The Third Way politics of wall street and big business is over.
Look at Bernie Sanders' "Anti-Endorsement" list, as an example
https://berniesanders.com/anti-endorsements/
Going AFTER big business, going AFTER wall street, going AFTER the people that you hint at to be the culprits in a crumbling democracy.
Things are changing, stop being so cynical. Headlines aren't everything. Go deeper.
Providing you the courtesy of a quick response @cyberdemon531, my wife has just arrived home unexpectedly with our grandchildren.
I am not sure when I will have a follow-up reply, as "real life" always takes priority for me. Hopefully, you'll understand ...
Fair enough. Take your time.