Earnings are almost never tied to labor unless you're the business owner. Earning are what you agree to receive when you accept a job offer. That step simply did not exist for slaves. They never had any choice, they were literally forced to work. By contrast you only pay taxes if you choose to work or choose to own property. Key word there being "choose."
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@lifeworship:
So your first link is by a guy who also seems to think chemtrails are a problem. That doesn't inspire much faith in his numbers.
Meanwhile here's a graph showing measles cases were slowly lowering but had a sharp drop-off when the vaccine was introduced: http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/graph-us-measles-cases
I'll also add this chart of deaths from measles that, if you drew a trend line would probably look more like your guy's graph: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsrates1940_60.pdf (page 85)
So here's my interpretation: Your guy used deaths from measles instead of actual incidents of measles, and there were fewer deaths because hygiene, medicine and other factors improved. In fact, here's a nice long blog post addressing exactly those points: http://www.harpocratesspeaks.com/2014/06/pre-vaccine-declines-in-measles.html
Now, as to your polio vaccine argument... it does appear that a virus in the vaccine could cause cancer. However they fixed that in 1961:
How would you feel about a tax on having children?
Basically, humans need to work and own property to live. Therefore the choice is:
a) die
b) live as a slave.
Which is not much of a choice.
ran out of replies, i'll answer your false choice here.
i don't engage in activities that kill children, honestly, what kind of a question is that? though pro vaccinators statistically, demonstrably, provably do. here :
is an article that the pro vaccination people never talk about. it shows the decrease in infectious disease, due to improvements in hygiene and sanitation, took place BEFORE the introduction of vaccines. vaccines didn't save us. in fact with the statistically provable death and debilitation rates of the use of vaccines, i'd say that your opinions are more of a threat to children than mine. Again, though, this is not an issue of whether or not these demonstrable poisons are safe to inject into the veins of children at ever increasing rates to pad the bottom line of the pharmaceutical companies, it is about the rights of the individual to choose accurate data when deciding what to inject into THEIR children's bodies or not.
here is an additional article on the favorite fallback argument of pro vaccination advocates, polio :
i do admire your tenacity. i wish you would read the data and join the informed. we would love to have you as an ally. http://genesgreenbook.com/resources/obamsawin/ImmunizationGraphs-RO2009.pdf http://www.thinktwice.com/Polio.pdf