I don't trust any politician, nor government, but that doesn't change the fact that he made several attempts to prevent war, OR, the fact that Germany was attacked because they created their own currency structures & models.
I'm not a sympathizer for anyone and I don't think he's a saint. But your post is a bit shallowly written and overly simplistic.
"Failing on the philosophical battlefield".... I mean, clearly your version of WW2 is the school-taught version. Go listen to Benajmin Freedman's speech and begin learning the real history of WW2 and hopefully it will change your perspective on why Germany was attacked and who initiated that.
Why was this post flagged?
Please do not flag posts for showing political views, no matter how much you disagree with them.
Free speech is for everyone. I do NOT respect "No platform for fascists."
Everyone is encouraged to speak their mind. If you disagree with them strongly enough to flag them, then counter their argument with a better argument instead.
And I'm supposed to believe your alternate version of WWII is the correct version?
It's no secret that USA schooling is filled with propaganda, but even so, I'm not so sure the other side is so wise either.
Of course, my post is still in the middle. I don't see Hitler as some exceptional monster, as many do, but I don't see him as a good guy either.
Wanting peace while preparing for war hardly convinces me though.