Does being first in the voters list mean they put the most of their voting power into the vote?
If yes, that is very unfair from gavvet doing this, promoting bad behaviour on the platform and stealing rewards from other users. He should do it the legit way as everyone else - by paying for promotion.
Thanks for pointing that out Bernie!
It means that they have the highest voting weight among all listed voters. In some cases a mere 1% vote is enough to make it to the top of the list, in a sea of 100% votes (whale vote).
I'm assuming gavvet isn't voting at only 1%, though, likely 100%.
Yes, you are right.
Wackou gave 25% and is in second position on the voters list.. Trafalgar gave 16% and is forth.
That means they get most of the curation rewards for not voting early when the post was posted. 100% means they voted early making more potential rewards to the author. But still wackou & trafalgar influenced more of their voting power thats why there on the top among others.
Thank you manualbot! :)
So gavvet voted early to make himself the most. Can we know how much reward he gave himself?