In a recent article published by TNW and entitled 'Chill: Robot-related job loss won’t be that bad (probably)' the possibility of robots taking jobs away from humans was examined in greater detail. In this piece I will examine arguments made and expand on the possibilities brought up by this piece.
How many jobs are in danger of being lost to robots?
Automation now threatens as much as 40 percent of the job market. And unfortunately for many of us, we’re on track to hit this target by 2030. But maybe it won’t be that bad.
This is a very large percentage of the job market which is vulnerable to takeover but generally the low hanging fruit will be sought after first so expect a more realistic figure to be more like 20 percent of the overall job market. This is still a huge number of jobs and means that 1 in 5 workers will be replaced by automation at bare minimum in the coming decade.
It’s a near-certainty that automation will cost workers thousands, maybe even millions of jobs over the next 20 to 30 years. It’s also clear that those displaced aren’t always the ones who benefit from the new industries automation makes possible.
According to this statement displacement may not result in a permanent job loss but rather a shift in career paths. This is an optimistic view to say the least. Certainly more jobs will be lost and finding new employment opportunities won't be easy or possible for all displaced workers...
What evidence do we have of this happening in the past and what was the overall result?
According to The Wall Street Journal:
After the first automated tellers were installed in the 1970s, an executive at Wells, Fargo & Co. predicted ATMs would lead to fewer branches with even fewer staff. And indeed, the average branch used one-third fewer workers in 2004 than in 1988.
As you can see, the ATM was highly disruptive. You’d be tempted to equate this disruption with job loss, as fewer employees at bank branches meant thousands were suddenly without jobs. But you’d be wrong.
Since ATMs made it much cheaper for banks to operate, it led to a boom, of sorts, in building new branches. From 1989 to 2004, banks opened 43 percent more physical locations than it did in the period before ATMs — leading to more jobs in banking, consequently.
I would say that this is a very unique case and a similar success story will not be seen with the majority of use cases to come. In a recent article Bill Gates proposed taxing robots and based on his stance and his position as one of the top industry leaders in the world, its not a possibility that many will lose jobs to robots in the next 20-30 years, its an absolute certainty. The question asked by the elite is simply 'where will I get my taxes from then?'
What are your thoughts about this topic and what should people do in order to get ready for this new and scary future?
Please leave your ideas and comments below.
Thanks for reading!
Source:
Chill: Robot-related job loss won’t be that bad (probably) - TNW
I'm not an expert by any means, but from what I've read by people with more insight than me, we'll see robots taking over lots and lots of jobs the next couple of decades.
It'll likely cost a lot less money to use robots than humans, but the income to companies and the government will remain more or less the same.
If the income continue to be (indirectly) distributed to the population, we can live comfortable lives, possibly with a little less money between our hands, but with more time for our family, friends and hobbies. This may even benefit the environment!
wrong. You'll be slaves. Think hunger games. Those movies are not for your enjoyment. They are PROGRAMMING.
Chill robot wont replace human but govern it. Someday they become overlords. Bring human to its extinction level.
nice post buddy I really appreciate it
Cool post. I love your story about technology
But Robots can do work more efficiently than a human.
great the technology don't stop thank's for share it with us , I ve followed you !
ok thats a good analysis
I think wealth and income equality will just get worse with this and it will be very difficult for society to deal with. The poor will have much less jobs available (and what is available will have lower wages due to increased competition). This will make class warfare issues much more difficult within countries. This will lead to increasing taxes on the rich. However with increased globalization, the richest can just easily move to lower tax country. I'm not sure how western countries will be able to deal with this (at this point there's no way they're ready).
Wealth and inequality will certainly get worse. We are seeing the more successful public companies of today reach revenue levels with 1/3-1/2 the employees than companies 30 years ago. The assertion that guys like Gates and Bezos could be trillion dollar guys is not out of the realm of possibility. Personally, I see massive explosion of the S&P over the next 10 years because of this very idea.
It's gonna be horrible. The NYT is fake news and pure propaganda. I can't believe how many people are still asleep. Absurd.
I was just talking with someone about this yesterday. I think it's very likely that one out of five jobs will be replaced by automation.
There will be opportunities and other jobs created... but the transition will not be a smooth one and the people who are out of work are not likely to be qualified for many of those newly created positions.
I see this as very problematic for the United States, as we've depending so much on "middle class" economy. It may be better in developing countries as they may be able to grow into a new economy more easily and eagerly.
Hard to predict what will happen... but that won't keep us from trying!
I would say that the bigger problem than automation and AI, is that we're not prepared for it. We hang on tight to our current systems and believe that it will be the same as the last wave of automation. Which (as far as we know) is most likely not the case.
I wrote a little about this recently, but with some diffrent views
https://steemit.com/ai/@theflow/the-rise-of-our-ai-saviour
Nice article,
but just to point out that invention of cars led to loss of jobs of trolleys and horse carts and the like, just cause an alternative is invented it doesn't necessarily mean its bad , jobs are lost, that much part we can agree, but you also have to accept that a new array of jobs would be created and in my point of thinking, the only jobs that robots can take over are the ones which don't require much thought.
But I also think , this shouldn't happen too fast. It must be regulated.
All in all, I think there is no way you can stop technological advancement and companies to use technology to cut down their costs. But what we can do, is ensure that we and our government place their interest in education of children so , they have the skills to pursue a job in a world where there would be value for a job that requires "thought".
Good post , next generation may suffer joblessness !! [please check out my post
https://steemit.com/science/@aryan12o/robot-in-action-will-robots-snatch-our-jobs ]