I'm not even going to address the majority of the stuff that is completely false on dimartino's articles
Why not? He has done pretty good job with his articles. If he has lied, @marklyford or you shouldn't have any problems proving him wrong.
Instead of explaining what is false in Demartino's articles, @marklyford has been attacking him personally and trying to discredit him. I think that pretty much proves that Demartino is on the right track. @marklyford is acting like a typical scammer.
You do realize point-blank that dimartino is personally attacking and trying to discredit him and now you're sitting here trying to blame Mark for something that's similar and pointing it out as being bad even though dimartino's doing the same thing. He's just doing it under the auspices of quote-unquote Journalism.
Kind of like it's okay to be prejudiced as long as it's in the name of religion.
No, I don't. Please explain. Demartino's articles are full of proofs, unlike Lyford's answers. I don't see anything that would implicate that Demartino has some kind of personal vendetta against Lyford. He is just showing the facts – and those facts tell that Lyford is clearly a scammer.
So far you and Lyford have been claiming that Demartino is lying, but you haven't pointed out a single thing that he is lying about. You have now made several comments to bash Demartino but you have only used rhetorics to discredit him and not revealed any proof that he is lying.
That is a typical behavior from a scammer so I'm now assuming that you are also a scammer.
Actually, Demartino is doing the exact same. What attacks tdo you refer to? The fact that demartino was publicy tied to a few scams himself, his reporting was found biased and paid off from previous places as reported in several discussions, he brings up marks arrest for marijuana cultivation, which honestly has nothing to do with the article than other to....OMG...ATTACK HIM AD HOMINEM with that and other things he fabricated to fit with his use about questioning Marks judgement. Yet when Mark questions the Ian's judegement about repeated drunk driving offenses, it is a "person attack" and "how dare" Mark?
DO you even understand the hypocrisy you are spouting? You are now guilty of the same thing you are trying to accuse him of.
I do not think Mark is an angel. He will be the first person to tell you I have been a very strong critic of some of his decisions. Likely I will still at times. But I also know the truth of matters, and who the person is as a person.
I find Demartino's articles really well written. @marklyford is the one who has been using ad hominem attacks instead of reason and facts.
They have been addressed several times by Mark.
Again, feel free to ask me specific questions if you have one.
He has in fact several times lied. But trying to reason with idiots or people that have an agenda is basically impossible. No matter what you do or say they're just going to twist it and turn it and do whatever they're going to do with it because it doesn't fit their narrative. That's why. But I already made the offer to discuss this with you in private and to tell you all sorts of information if you have any questions.
Have you even tried? Just state the facts and let everybody see the truth.
This is highly suspicious. Usually when people don't want to discuss in public, they have something to hide.
Steem is actually great platform for this kind of discussion because nobody can delete anything. If somebody lies, it's recorded permanently in the blockchain.
Yes, I am trying now with no avail.
Lol suspicious. Keep coming up with excuses to not address the actual matter and keep spreading FUD. Private shouldn't be a problem, and you can "report back" your findings.