its not photo shopped its false color. How well can you see radio waves? Can you tell the difference between 901nm and 901.1nm light that well?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
its not photo shopped its false color. How well can you see radio waves? Can you tell the difference between 901nm and 901.1nm light that well?
I appreciate your comment but have watched an interview with NASA 'scientist' who clearly explains his process, which most certainly involves photoshop. And you only have to look at some of the earth images to see the obvious copy/paste cloud formations.
there are many interviews with nasa scientists..........
GPS proves you wrong nice try though
I think you misunderstand the purpose of my post. I am not trying to prove anything. I am asking questions. Which no one has answered :(
Photoshop is commonly used to crop you are not providing enough specifics with that.
Used to crop??!! Do some research on this and then get back to me. I can assure you it is used for far more than this. The most famous image of earth, known as 'blue marble' and used as one of the default iphone screensavers, was created by NASA's Robert Simmon who plainly admits it was created in photoshop based on data.
mfw he literally takes the data and changes the colors slightly to make it look better
mfw you literally say "based on data" and "not real" together
btw false color would fall into that
I still would like a source on that statement, I'm 99% sure you just made it up.
I'm literally going into cosmology so I probably have done far more research than you already
It is not my intention to antagonise you. I am just sharing what I have learned about how images of earth are created.
To quote the article I am about to give you: 'The problem, Simmon said, is all the NASA earth-observing satellites are in low-earth or geostationary orbit, meaning none of them are far enough away to see a full hemisphere. The most familiar pictures of the entire Earth are from the 1960s and 1970s Apollo missions to the moon.'
So, when you read the article you will see that he uses photoshop a large amount in his process.
To quote you 'Photoshop is commonly used to crop' and I am simply letting you know that my limited research has led me to believe it is used for more than just cropping.
Enjoy the article and I sincerely wish you the best with your career in cosmology.
https://qz.com/192700/the-guy-who-created-iphones-earth-image-explains-why-he-needed-to-fake-it/
so I'm just going to ignore that source entirely
also....... heres a video from the time of carl sagan
the pale blue dot picture was taken wayyyyy before apple even existed btw
and the picture above is the pale blue dot btwwww
also what is wrong with stichtingtogether strips of data from a satellite that is too close to Earth to take a whole picture.
also just like up the millions of hubble pictures, it would take a hundred thousand people working full time just to fake them lmao
also real question
just because an apple background is made with photoshop......the earth is flat?
what the fuck tho
Your very first words to me were 'its not photo shopped' and you were '99% sure' I was lying to you. You asked for my source and I gave it to you. Yet now that you stand corrected, instead of saying sorry you have become aggressive.
All I wanted was for someone to answer my questions in the post and you (nor anyone for that matter) has been able to do that. Thank you for your time. I wish you all the best.
you said the pale blue dot picture was photoshopped and the picture was not the pale blue dot how retarded can you be?
I was completely correct
"omg the earth on my iphone background is fake it must be flat"