You need to find ways to avoid rewarding scammers like this one. Do you check reputation? If it's gone negative then that should indicate something is wrong.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You need to find ways to avoid rewarding scammers like this one. Do you check reputation? If it's gone negative then that should indicate something is wrong.
What I would like to know is how the rewards for these posts are going to be handled. I never gave this poster permission to repost my content.
Also, I can see where you are coming from being that your post value is essentially the image itself. As much as the script helps us to streamline the process and using a teaser image would more often than not attract people to go visit the post. In your case, your post consisted of one image so that would not have behooved you. All in all, the project is so new and there are a lot of kinks to work out. I sincerely appreciate your feedback and will use it to exercise greater discernment.
@winstonwolfe I appreciate the concern. My intention is only to highlight non-self voters which I had surmised would be good for Steemit as a platform and encourages others to visit your post for engagement. If you do not wish to be featured, I will be happy to create an exception in my script.
Furthermore, trump3t is currently operating at a loss of roughly 0.2-0.3 SBD per day but we believe in this project. Rewards are given out daily to followers and SP is used to further support non self-voters. Trump3t is indeed a community support initiative.
@trump3t ... Thanks for the initiative and also for supporting new steem members. I sincerely believe that you will be able to create a community that will affect generations. Just keep doing the good work ... Together we can make a great and better community for everyone ... Kudos
My concern is simply being asked for permission to repost my content, rather than to be told it has been reposted. In the event that one of these posts happened to garner, say, $50. Would you be keeping that or dispersing it among the creators you featured?
Trump3t queries a total of 100 posts and usually finds somewhere around 15 or so that are not self-voted ( a sad thing in and of itself). If there was a 'do not share' attribute on posts, it would be a cinch but it is not the case I'm afraid.
The problem is that we want to get authors rewards prior to payout so time is of the essence. The overhead introduced from having to stop and request permission would essentially kill the efficacy of the what the project aims to do for Steemians.
There is no intention of cashing out on Trump3t. Rest assured, we plan to use any and all rewards to power up and further support non-self voters.
That is a phenomenal idea! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Should be an easy adjustment to the script.