You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What some people don't get about sexuality

in #sex8 years ago

Who is to say that we need to increase our population? Even if we aquire (usurp) another planet I do not think there is a literal NEED for reproduction. However, there are many elitists who claim that the population needs tl be reduced because we are all useless eaters....now, I dont agree with this, but at least they make a case: whats yours? @pompe72

Sort:  

Ok then, but if you have a population 100% homo, then it will go extinct, not being able to reproduce (at least in a natural way).

Of course. It is not something to be encouraged in my opinion, but I dont think the idea should be bashed. If a population turned 100 % homo (which is impossible because no authority can control the desires of so many different types of people into one category) we could still clone human babies by duplicating embryos.

But if you go that route, the laws of naturale selection would go to hell. Plus you would have a more complex system for creating humans, and the more complex a system is the more fragile it is.
This blog reminds me of the film Gattica.

@pompe72 what is gattica?

Sorry typo, the film is Gattaca. In the future, parents select their best genomes to reproduce their kids and the naturally (casualy) born are looked down on. This brings discrimination between the more advanced selected people and the average unselected Joes.

Explain how this makes sense to someone who is activley progressive in removing the word "normal" from his vocabulary? Nothing is normal in this universe. The idea of normal is a scam to get you to act like everyone else, just like mental dis-ease. A label.

Normal is like the center of a circle, all the points form the circle, but there is no point in the center of the circle.

I dont believe in normal. The law of least resistance is what govwrns behavior. Away from pain and towards pleasure, or going in the direction with tje least hurdles but that will take you to the same end point. If there is a normal, then it is the laws of the universe. (One being the fact we exist) but also who is to say that if other universes and /or omniverses exist, they do not go by different rules and therefore would have a toltaly different definition of normal? What you describe with the circle is laws of geometry, who is to say those laws are not different in anpther universe?

Normal: the average or mean. Depends on your definition of normal.