I believe we need more clarity here. this has no limits for the DAO manager to write blank checks.
the DAO manager could laterally bring proposals fourth every hour, and just burn up the DAO dec funds on half baked ideas.
Also the idea of the 100k DEC burn was to make sure users had to use their own DEC to bring fourth a proposal. in this scenario. the DAO manager could bring everyone's proposals forward at no cost to the individuals. effectively negating the need for community members to have to put forward their own 100k DEC
I believe this needs a up to 4 proposals a month close for free... or something. i see this as ripe for abuse.
I can assure you I have no intention of just making proposals willy nilly for anyone. Anything I make a proposal on will be thoroughly reviewed with good faith attempts at reaching a soft consensus and having the proposals reviewed before I even post them. Keep in mind if I act stupid it's very easy to fire me. I think trying to put a number on this just means we could either be pushing proposals just to hit a number or end up backlogging proposals for the next month. I'd rather it just work organically and if its a problem we'll deal with it.
If there was some wording in here about the DAO manager can not pay the DEC cost for player proposals, I don't disagree with the concept. and i can agree to not having a set number.
If if its not clearly stated, then we cant hold the DAO manager accountable. Just like the proposal passed to ban battle helpers from modern, by simply putting it in the TOS.
if this proposal doesn't say , then we cant hold the DAO manager accountable.
I think that's the most reasonable way to word it. Outright putting "will not make a proposal for another player" seems very open to interpretation when I'm having ongoing discussions with the community throwing out ideas. It would be easy to say I just made someone's proposal. If you check out how we're doing things in the discord right now you'll probably see what I mean. These topics are getting battled over and I'm not making any proposals without getting to a point where there's a solid majority in agreement.
Fair enough. I had played around with trying to figure out a number and some kind of "good faith" agreement on how I'd use it, but ultimately it felt like trying to validate that I wasn't going to try to get myself fired 🤣 I'll clarify that I cannot make random player proposals.
Without meaning to sound rude, assurances aren't worth anything contractually speaking, and especially in the crypto space, something legally binding is needed