That's great. Essentially I think we want:
(1) Current status of the work (to give more transparency on how far along we are).
(2) A clear budget (from Matt, given he knows best on the completion rate) needed to complete the work within 6 months.
(3) A review of the importance of Validators (I think it's important to itemize this again to get the Community's support).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Brave: please read the conversation between Matt and myself; he says he can get it done this year. In that case I see no need to fund this.
There have been other conversations about more important funding allocations
Ah, I had missed that, thanks for pointing it out Azircon. Ok, makes sense.