I hear you loud and clear, and I'm not sure which way I'm voting yet. I'm just looking at it form the perspective that all of what you detail happened in a deep bear, and that we literally spent 0 effort even trying to bring in new players. My question is... when a bull kicks in and we are actively working to onboard new players... will having these listings be worth it? It's a matter of positioning and looking ahead instead of looking at past mistakes. Past mistakes go deeper than saying these listings did nothing in the past - there are a lot of other reasons we have not been bringing in new players.
As I said I'm undecided right now, and appreciate your POV as always!
My perspective is that the days of exposure on centralization acting as marketing are over now that there are so so many tokens. Before it seemed as though being one of 10 coins out of 500 moving a day might draw some new interest, but now there are thousands of coins on these big exchanges, thus the exposure gained may be much lower now.
I think supporting more pairings on HiveEngine + Onboarding videos on how to make the process easy might be a better way to go. I have no idea either, and also am not knowledgeable enough on the subject to think I have the correct answer. Just sitting in my chair trying to predict behavior.
If we want to have something "just in case" we hit a bull, then I think we should spend as little money as possible to have that available option. That's why I was willing to accept 1 exchange as a compromise.
But going for 2 exchanges is ignoring the point that these have been a waste of money and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future. Its a vote that says for ONLY $18k MORE dollars (in addition to the $42k for one) we can have two tier 2 exchanges (instead of 1) providing NO VALUE until such time they MIGHT be useful when everything else is in line.
If the proposal is changed to 1 exchange and we put some fiscal discipline into our thought process then I wouldn't vote against it in deference to your point of view (and the others that think the same way). But if it stays as 2 exchanges, then I think we are not really serious in protecting the capital in the DAO and to me that's a big mistake.
I didn't vote wolf's proposal to save the DAO money because I don't think we should be risking $50k at this time on something speculative. I surely would rather have his attempt to grow his game (and thus ours) rather than repeat the same wasteful spending to 2nd tier exchanges that require payola for us to be listed.
And I also appreciate the dialogue Jimmy, I'm not mad at you or anyone who votes for it. My negativity for this is: