Sort:  

Absolutely. I know all about @bronko's other proposal. It's, as you say, basically the same; there's just a change to one word in his statement:
"accounts with a completely normal deck and no harmful behavior will have to rent own CP unnecessarily. This doesn’t make sense"

Everything I said applies, just as much, to the original proposal as it does to this one- restrictions in a format called "Wild", don't make sense.

OTOH: any pro-bot/anti-player proposals, such as these, will always receive my hearty approval and endorsement.

there are also other differences in my proposal.

  1. no requirements for bronze.
  2. no effect on glint!
  3. the cooldown rule does not penalize people who, for example, just get a card sent to them that they just buy on the market for land etc etc.

There were a few other differences between the proposals too

  • you didn't discriminate against CP
  • no CP cooldown for delegated cards

and a few more little differences.

Overall your original proposal was simpler, easier to program, easier implement and made more sense while also being much more punishing toward new players.

You are right.
I had to double-check this one- there IS a requirement for Bronze! Which just seems dumb but who am I to say?

Thats even creazier would destroy the rental mkt