Clay, I think this is going to be messy regardless of the vote...
Scenario A: This proposal passes
What are we considering as a measure of success? And over what time period?
What is "a significant amount" of DEC burned?
I guess there is Market fees, Tournament entries, all that stuff?
Are we looking at this as potential for new spellbooks and cross-game marketing?
The success metrics are really fuzzy...
Scenario B: This proposal fails...
So what does this revert to? I believe the rshares formula we approved computes with zero SPS staked... or do we go back to the prior approved one - deliver SPS based on packs held? Or does it nullify everything?
I think it's going to be hard for people to know what they are voting for.
Well Scenario A doesn't really have to be that clearly defined. I suggested they essentially increase the price of things they are designing to add a DEC burn. Tournament tickets, season passes, promos? Whatever, they need a DEC burn. Their CEO said he's willing to work in the DEC burns, so here's a proposal providing us an option to move forward. I don't have a perfect solution for anyone here, just woke up and was met with a bunch of messages complaining about the situation and tried to help us find a solution. If a solution can't be found, I guess we'll figure out what happens from there. I really don't know.