Steem Debate (Get Paid For Your Opinion) Round #10 Results And Round #11 Topic

[mwanjo]

This is round #11 of this contest in the form of a debate, is now a steembasicincome contest. Like in all the steembasicincome contests, you will have a chance to win SBI shares. SteemBasicIncomeShares started in Round #9. In this issue, we will be having the results of the last round and the launching of the new round's TOPIC.

ONE CAN NOT BE MADLY IN LOVE WITH MORE THAN ONE PERSON AT THE SAME TIME!

Are you FOR or AGAINST?

PictureSource

In this fish tank every fish eats.

PictureSource

Check the screenshot below to see the amount of STEEM generated in the last round.

Last Round's Results And Awards

Due to the high earnings of last week's Topic, with the generous publicity of @mwanjo with amazing Upvote Bot. Hence, the topic post has generated 1.45 STEEM which has been shared as designated by the topic post.

1st Prize @berthajoelle 30% award 0.417 STEEM plus 1 SBI share

2nd Prize @jadyclem 20% award 0.278 STEEM plus 1 SBI share

Participatory Prizes 50% to 6 other participants award 0.695 ÷ 6, giving 0.116 per participant.

1. @ashikstd award 0.116 STEEM.

2. @resuscitate award 0.116 STEEM.

3. @kimbygrr award 0.116 STEEM.

4. @ucizahra award 0.116 STEEM.

5. @crypticat award 0.116 STEEM.

6. @improv award 0.116 STEEM.

Check the screenshot below for proof of payments.

Congratulations to all participants. On Steem Debate @mwanjo; We are all WINNERS!

This is for entertainment and educational purposes only and may not reflect the deepest convictions of the authors. So please DON'T TAKE IT TOO PERSONAL.

RULES FOR THE CURRENT ROUND!

State in the comments:

1. Whether you are FOR or AGAINST

the debate topic. That is whether you are in support of the debate topic or not.

2. State as many points as possible to defend your stand, please number them.

3. Two persons with the most distinct and insightful points as judged by the steem debate team will be announced the winner on Saturday.

4. Follow Me and UpVote the post to generate the money that you will win.

In this way, TWO persons will get a good prize every weekend.

(IF YOU RESTEEM THE POST IT MAY MAKE MORE MONEY FOR YOU TO SHARE ON SATURDAY) NOT A REQUIREMENT THOUGH. JUST SUGGESTING THAT YOU MAY RESTEEM THE POST TO HELP.

5. All official participants in the contest have to present their work in the format:

Stand

Reason 1. Abc

Reason 2. Cba

Reason 3. Acb

Etc.

Numbering your reasons is mandatory.

REWARDS

REWARDS FOR THE ROUND

First Prize: 30% of the STEEM Generated at the payout of the post. + 1 steembasicincome share.

Second prize: 20% of the STEEM Generated at the payout of the post. (DUE TO THE CONTINUES DROPPING OF THE STEEM PRICE AND THE LOW STEEM GENERATED BY THE DEBATE POST, WE CAN ONLY AFFORD 1 STEEMBASICINCOME SHARE A WEEK.

so only the first prize will gwt a SBI share. Good luck to you all.

Participatory prize: 50% of the STEEM Generated at the payout will be shared with all participants.

Prizes may be reviewed next round. Any suggestions?

Questions about steem basic income?

Please read their recently published FAQ. Most questions are addressed in our FAQ or in the additional resources that it suggests. If you still have questions, ask in the comments section or join steembasicincome in our discord channel. To review your share counts, we explain our tracking sheet here.

ROUND #9 TOPIC

ONE CAN NOT BE MADLY IN LOVE WITH MORE THAN ONE PERSON AT THE SAME TIME!

Are you FOR or AGAINST?

READ THE RULES AND COMMENT TO WIN A BEAUTIFUL PRIZE ON SATURDAY IF ONLY YOU FOLLOW THE RULES.

You Can Be A Winner whether you are FOR or AGAINST.

Your Opinion Counts.

You Will Be Paid For Your Opinion.

It Will Only Cost You An Up Vote.

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT

THIS DEBATE IS CALLED

STEEM DEBATE @MWANJO

AND THE TOPICS ARE SELECTED BY MWANJO WHO IS THE SOUL SPONSOR OF THE DEBATE.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO RUN STEEM DEBATES LIKE THIS ONE INDICATE IN A SEPARATE COMMENT FROM YOUR DEBATE COMMENT.

IN YOUR APPLICATION COMMENT STATE A PROMISE OR WILLINGNESS TO SUSTAIN YOUR DEBATES FOR AT LEAST 10 ROUNDS MINIMUM.

HENCE YOUR DEBATE WILL BE CALLED STEEM DEBATE @YOURUSERNAME

FOR EXAMPLE

STEEM DEBATE @SURFYOGA.

OR

STEEM DEBATE @berthajoelle

We can have many debates a week!

When An Application Comment is Submitted, we will all vote under it stating whether an individual should run steem debates or not.

We also welcome suggested topics from debaters.

If you have a great topic, suggest it in a separate comment as well.

Ok, GOOD LUCK EVERYONE!

Comments

[theironfelix]

I am against the motion!

The points:

1. Just because you madly love one person, doesn’t equate, logically, that you cannot madly love another person. What I am saying here: the condition, “madly falling in love with someone,” isn’t restricted to one person.
2. To expand that point, polyamorphus people so exist and often have multiple lovers. This is different from, say, polygamy as polyamorphus means not multiple wifes but multiple lovers.
3. Going even further, people can find two people that they ideally love and can often struggle to just stick to one love-interest. I don’t need to recall highschool, uni/college or middle school, now do I?
4. Often with breakups, people do get seperated and, rarely, get back together. So the need to feel loved is very strong yet repressed at the same time. Yet in rare cases, people who do “mentally heal” from the event can often love, once again, who they broke up while loving another person as well. Joy is a miracle drug.
5. The concepts of multiple partners runs it way down back to antiquity - I do not need to speak of sexual activities, but certainly if they were willing to go that far they ought to have a baseline love of each other and trust at the same time.
6. To bring it into contemporary times, the Sexual Revolution of ‘68 goes to show that multiple partners in a relationship can work - doesn’t mean it has to be that way for long.
7. Which that tradition in antiquity follows us even to today with LGBTQIA+ communities that certainly does have polyamorphic people in its fray.
8. To make a final pitstop in theoriticals, love, whether “a chem reaction” or a real thing, is subjectivised heavily by a person. How they view how they can best deal with love and find corresponding/complementing partners that shares that vision should be taken into consideration. As such, it shouldn’t be surprising polyamorphic relations do sprout out in society.

[mwanjo]

hahaha
interesting

[mwanjo]

you are giving the balance we need in this debate.
thank YOU.

[supriyagade]

For

1. Yes, one person can not fall in love more than one person at same tome. Because if you are in love then all them time you will think about that person. You can not imagine 2 person same time for love.
2. Love is bond between 2 people. It is not a trangle.
3. If you are madly in love with one person then you can not imagine other person in your mind.
4. Some times people gets confused between love and attraction, live and friendship. They are not able to find correct feeling. When you find your correct feeling then only you are able to deeply and madly love one person.

These are my thoughts for love.
May be other people have different opinions.
I don't want to blame anyone. It just my opinion for debate. Thank you!!

Have a goid day!☺👌👍

[mwanjo]

Thanks Dear👏
Like this...

PictureSource
Hahahaha

[supriyagade]

Your welcome

[mwanjo]

I just saw this meme now and i think it is so true.
What do you think?

PictureSource

[ashikstd]

I'm for (About true love).

Reason 1. Normally love needs a heart to exchange which we have only one and we can't split it.
Reason 2. When someone committed to another one; they can't cheat directly.
Reason 3. One can be fallen in love with multiple persons at the same time but they can't treat all of them equally; the true lover would always be the real one and others are for benefit, i guess.

[mwanjo]

Hahaha really?
Ok!
Thanks for sharing.

[ucizahra]

Thank you as always Sir @mwanjo

[mwanjo]

You are welcome always!

[resteemator]

@resteemator is a new bot casting votes for its followers. Follow @resteemator and vote this comment to increase your chance to be voted in the future!

[kimbygrr]

For.

1. If you have a connection with someone worth to say you are in love, it has to be with one person or else it's not called love.
2. Love means giving every piece of you to the person you are in love with. How can you give every piece to ONE person if you're sharing with another one.
3. When you feel attracted to someone, you can be attracted to many other people but when you feel in love with someone, that emotion awakes for just one person.
4. When deciding between two things, even if we think we like both things equally, truth is, we always prefer one thing over the other one. So, if you think you're in love with two persons, probably you're just confused. You must be in love with one of that two persons.

[mwanjo]

Hahaha
wow
the debate is on.
Giving every piece of you, is a great definition.
I like it.
Thanks for sharing!
th

[anthonyadavisii]

My position is for the proposition that one cannot be madly be in love with two persons simultaneously.

1. Mutually exclusive desires arising in such relationships will reveal the truth of who the person "madly loves".

The point assumes that the defining aspect of love is sacrifice but we are considering such in the romantic context. Being "madly in love with a person" in my eyes necessitates a true love and that entails the individual is willing to sacrifice all to be with that person and this includes foregoing pursuing any additional romantic interests which would undoubtedly include pleasing the desires of the latter romantic interest which could conflict with the interests of the former.

Take the scripture below to further clarify the point. Bear in mind it is not referring exclusively to romance but the principle of mutually exclusive interests can apply.

Matthew 6:24 KJVS
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Let's say one wants to settle down and start a family while the other wants the party lifestyle. The decision the person makes will reveal the one who they are truly madly in love with.

1. You only have one "all" to give.

This follows the preceding definition of love. If both partners were in front of a firing squad and you could only jump in front to save one sacrificing your life. This will prove the one you love madly.

I think one problem with my points is the word "madly" which is suggestive of being irrational. I think the phrase conveys loving someone tk a degree in which you do things that don't make sense. I was tempted to make an argument that sacrificing your life for your partner would go against our instincts and be counterintuitive to ine holding a purely secular or Darwinian understanding of man but the may not be the case.

It does make me wonder if males sacrificing themselves for their mates is a common thing in the animal kingdom. Perhaps, it is not and we definitely defy our instincts when we give our lives for our partner. It does seem to stand at odds with "survival of the fittest" so perhaps it is love that is able to cause us to suspend our cold survival instinct. If so, I think it is poetic that love is demonstrated to transcend rationality.

[mwanjo]

powerful intervention.
Thanks

[jadyclem]

For

1. Exclusivity is a very key requirement in love. The moment you profess romantic love to someone else, you're indirectly telling him/her that you're making yourself available to him/her alone.

2. There's no way you can give yourself completely to two different individuals or treat them equally. So it's difficult to be in love with more than one person.

3. There can't be love without commitment and you can't commit yourself fully to more than one persons

4. You can be attracted to more than one person but you can't be in love with more than one person

5. You can't love two people the same way or treat them equally. So being in love with more than person at same time is not possible

[mwanjo]

i am loving this.
the debate is completely dominated by FOR.
of course the reality around us shows that there are many people experiencing that which is
AGANST
just pointing out, not to you personally though.

thanks for your debate.
great stuff.

[jadyclem]

Romantic love in the real sense of the word can only be expressed to one individual at a time. Someone can be in a relationship with several individuals at same time it doesn't mean that he/she is in love with all of them. Love is much more than sex or meeting someone's material needs. It's much deeper than that. I know that you're married so you'll understand what I'm talking about.

[mwanjo]

Hahaha
How do you know that I am married?
Hahaha
Yeah, I understand what you are talking about.
Hahaha
👏👏👏

[ucizahra]

I m for:

1. At first i m start from myself, when i love on person, is difficult to think others, because one person only can take all your time. How can you divided your heart to others?

2. When you really love someone so madly then you will learn ho to loyal to them.

3. When you still can cheat to them , that's mean have two reason, first because you not really love to them or simply other are your thing to kill time.

When we mad in love to one person is like this world only for both of us. So only the person are interesting and all our focus directly to them, no others.

That only my thoughts especially for myself . When i love someone than i will always try to love him , build love for him. Falling in love is easy than build love. 😊

[thundercurator]

PRICES HAVE CHANGED TO 0.150 and 0.151!!!
NEW TIER UPVOTES user guide


Current price is 0.150 or 0.151 SBD for 200%, 250%, or 300% upvote based on tier level.

200% ($0.30) - Bronze Level - No requirements
250% ($0.37) - Silver Level - SteemAuto Upvote of 100% or $0.02 (whichever is possible)
300% ($0.45) - Gold Level - SteemAuto Upvote of 100% or $0.02 AND 50 SP delegation

All delegators make a "striking" return on your investment!
50 SP --- 100 SP --- 200 SP --- 500 SP --- 1000 SP

That being said...

BOOOOOOOOOM!!!

The ground shakes as incredible power lights the sky. The thunder tests the quality of your post and deems it worthy, rewarding it with an upvote and comment from @thundercurator.

Investors who delegate SP to @thundercurator are entitled to 75% of @thundercurator income after curation. Get on-board early and grow with us!

[ewondo]

I am Against the Motion in this week's topic.

1. If it was not possible for one to be madly in love with more than one person then why is there so much polygamy and polyandry in the world today as well as far back as a human can remember or have in records.
2. People must be crazily in love in order for them to go through the troubles of running two homes.
3. If the statement in the topic was true then why are there so many cheaters in the world?
   Hahaha just come to think about it. LOL

[jlsplatts]

Flagged for comment spam. Please provide something useful insight to the post you are commenting on.
@steemflagrewards

[steemflagrewards]

SFR DiscordSteem Flag Rewards mention comment has been approved! Thank you for reporting this abuse, @jlsplatts categorized as comment spam. This post was submitted via our Discord Community channel. Check us out on the following link!

Want to delegate to Steem Blockchain Moderation? Here are some handy links!

50 SP,100 SP,500 SP,1000 SP

[mwanjo]

@johnstaff, please why do you say you have upvoted the post when you have not?

Why do you say you have upvoted when you have not.

See the current upvotes on this post...

johnstaff please be careful with what you post on steemit.

On steemit, we don't lie, because everything we do can be verified even by people who don't even have a steemit account.

Things like this may be the reason why your reputation is so alarmingly low.

I am just trying to help you here.

I wish you all the best on your steemit journey.

[mwanjo]

Up till now you have still not upvoted.
Even after 17 persons have upvoted you are still not among.
See for yourself...

[ashikstd]

Maybe that's the reason behind his low reputation.
he might be spamming like this only.

[jlsplatts]

Spammer- that is your answer. Go take a look at all the many comments this user makes. They are all the same.

[ashikstd]

yeah you're right.
i wander how do they keep doing this?

[mwanjo]

They may have a programme, a bot or something like that. This can't be done manually.
or can it?