There's not much to understand, she is voting at the last minute to try to hide the large amounts she is rewarding to (likely) her own sill accounts.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There's not much to understand, she is voting at the last minute to try to hide the large amounts she is rewarding to (likely) her own sill accounts.
Then maybe having some kind of sufficient KYC to prevent shill accounts would help here ?
Ok, so the key here is that it's someone who controls several accounts, right ? Have you by any chance seen my question about steem delegating large chunks of SP (10000SP+) to people seemingly at random ? Could you please do a "Sunday class" on how is this ?
Crypto are finite, unlike FIAT. There is a cap to the rewards that can be shared amongst all posts. The reward someone gets from his posts lowers when the SBD value drops or abusers do these tricks to get a bigger piece of the pie.
I think you've mistaken this for a classroom.
I don't know, in this case it looks like she's a shield for 700k delegated from others who want to cash out but have neutral to positive public images from their involvements with other projects.
Is there any way to counteract their actions, and how can an army defend bad practices? Thanks...
There is no way so far, since Steemit is not supposed to be regulated. It's like the wild west where the cunning and the bold get on top of things.
Flagging your reply for
-abuse of your multiple sock puppet Steemit accounts used to upvote yourself and unmerited payout.