Dear @berniesanders, I want to ask you a question: Isn't it all a problem of how the whole system is build? I deeply respect the idea of freedom behind the blockchain and Steemit. But who can decide where the boundaries are? In some way the community takes care for itself. But it creates a lot of discussing, where noone seems to be right. They call you a communist. So trying to fight for social behaviour to some around here is the same as being a communist. When you criticize some peoples behaviour, they answer with "The system doesn't say, it's illegate to do so". Though many of us carry along a feeling of immorality regarding this behaviour. Shouldn't the system itself provide more boundaries, so people can't come up with telling us: "it is possible to do so, so I do it and there is nothing wrong about it"? Why is abusing the community possible, when it's all about being a great community? When I got something wrong, please don't flag me. Please answer my questions instead so I can learn.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Crypto are finite, unlike FIAT. There is a cap to the rewards that can be shared amongst all posts. The reward someone gets from his posts lowers when the SBD value drops or abusers do these tricks to get a bigger piece of the pie.
I know. My question of how this is possible was meant rethorical. By the way: how often did you make this comment???
"They call you a communist. "
Because he is one by definition. If you use a term like "XXXX is making too much", you are pretty much a communist.
A communist to me is someone who wants a society by dictatorship, where everyone earns the same money. This is far away for me from criticizing when some earn much more than others because of an acting that is blind for the community and the relations in it. There are shades in between capitalism and communism.