Just a suggestion -- could we get some basic formatting on the transcript above, rather than a quick and dirty copy paste?
The only reason this stuff is readable in discord is because of the different coloured usernames and line shading -- this is practically unfollowable.
Or maybe some actual meeting minutes with action items and takeaways that correspond with an agenda? I realize this meeting was a bit spur-of-the-moment -- but perhaps something to consider for next time.
It isn't meant to be formal, it's just a log on what was said in the process.
Totally understand -- just merely suggesting that rather than providing an unformatted chat log; putting a few moments into formatting to make the lines with authors and timestamps bold (or something similar) so they stand out from the discussion a bit better, would make this substantially more digestible (at least for myself).
But maybe I'm the only one.
Considering that one of the tension/drama points in the whole Steem-alliance / SteemitInc discussion over the last few weeks was related to the stake from a ninja-mine (which was largely possible, from what I understand, because the mining information was "made available" but poorly documented to a point where people had a hard time making heads or tails of it) -- starting this initiative with an emphasis on communication and clarity might not be a poor decision.
Quick Edit: I realize this entire initiative is about communication and accountability, and in itself is a great stride towards that goal. Just tossing out some feedback. Sometimes it's nice to keep things tidy for those of us who don't read so good.
I think the suggestion was fine. :)
Consider it a trascript vs. a formal communication.