Sort:  

Totally understand -- just merely suggesting that rather than providing an unformatted chat log; putting a few moments into formatting to make the lines with authors and timestamps bold (or something similar) so they stand out from the discussion a bit better, would make this substantially more digestible (at least for myself).

But maybe I'm the only one.


Considering that one of the tension/drama points in the whole Steem-alliance / SteemitInc discussion over the last few weeks was related to the stake from a ninja-mine (which was largely possible, from what I understand, because the mining information was "made available" but poorly documented to a point where people had a hard time making heads or tails of it) -- starting this initiative with an emphasis on communication and clarity might not be a poor decision.

Quick Edit: I realize this entire initiative is about communication and accountability, and in itself is a great stride towards that goal. Just tossing out some feedback. Sometimes it's nice to keep things tidy for those of us who don't read so good.

I think the suggestion was fine. :)

Consider it a trascript vs. a formal communication.