Cryptocurrencies have a significant handicap when it comes to being adopted for regular usage in commercial transactions – the answers so far to the question “why should anyone want them” have been inadequate.
If you’re a speculator and want to bet on the price of the currency going up, then you already have the answer you want, but that has nothing to do with regular commercial transactions.
If you want freedom from government control over money, that’s fine, but you’ve just subtracted the one and only factor that makes fiat currencies accepted.
Governments who issue their own currency will only accept that currency for the payment of taxes. Nothing else. If you try to give them gold bullion, they’ll refuse it. If you owe back taxes and don’t have any money, they’ll seize your property and have it sold at auction, keeping the portion owed and giving you back the rest (many people think keep all of the money from the sale, but they’re not that evil.). Either that or they’ll throw you in jail. Or maybe both?
It’s this threat of force – having your property and/or your freedom taken away from you – that makes people want the currency that the Government created. They need it so that they can rent their freedom.
Banks create money
Some people might point out that banks create money and that everyone uses that. This is true, but the money that banks create is credit, and this credit is your claim on the Government-created money that the bank has in their ATM’s or in their reserve accounts at the central bank. If everyone tries to withdraw all of their money from a commercial bank, the bank won’t have enough Government-created money to satisfy those claims and will go out of business, which is an issue that regulators are trying to deal with.
What if taxes could be paid with STEEM?
If a monetary sovereign government accepted someone else’s currency for the payment of taxes, then their own currency may possibly no longer be used in the economy. This would mean that government spending would rely entirely on their ability to get the other currency, which is no different from going back to the failed system of the gold standard.
However, not all governments are monetary sovereigns. Sub-national governments (state and local level) don’t issue the national currency, but are allowed to accept other currencies for the payment of taxes or rates (disclaimer: permission to do this may vary in jurisdictions around the World). Some of them have started issuing their own community currencies.
The bottom line
Whether or not it’s a good idea for a government to accept a cryptocurrency for taxes/rates is another matter. The fact of the matter is this - so long as governments use the threat of force to back their currencies, crypto will never displace them. Either that or crypto's need to leverage the governments threat of force.
Maybe I'm wrong and there's another way. Let me know in the comments.
Their isn't enough prisons to lock us all up.
When the monkeys figure this out, they are gonna be mad.
https://leavingscientology.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/the-monkey-master/
The politicians will be ahead of the curve, imo,.
Which do you think they prefer?
Accept cryptos, or accept loss of total control?
You make a valid point, but I can’t help but feel that history has shown us that the overwhelming majority of people have a high tolerance for being exploited, controlled and mistreated. Developed countries are moving in a more authoritarian direction, which may be taking us closer to the breaking point where people say enough is enough, but I think that things will have to get a lot worse before that happens.
Yes, lots of slavery embracers amoungst us.
Rule by force is the disease, who and how are symptoms.
Until the folks stop embracing rule by bullies, this is what we get.
The only way to teach people to stop being afraid is by example. Unfortunately, most people aren't motivated to even leave a comment on content that they liked, let alone speak out against a bully over the Internet.
Yeah, until more folks are willing to get into the streets and throw rocks at cops it is unlikely to change for the better.
I mean, look how far down hill we have come.
When I was a kid if you got caught driving drunk the sheriff took you home and let your parents handle it.
Now you get a lifelong, publicly available, scarlet letter.
Are you in the US? The first time I visited that country was in 1995 and I couldn't believe how authoritarian the police were. They acted like they were gods. I also saw two of them driving around drunk on a quad bike, causing trouble for regular people.
I don't think violence will be at all necessary to get things back to a sensible way of operating. Accountability has diminished over time and needs to be restored.
Im on the great plains.
We have lost much freedom since i was a kid.
Rule by force is the disease, who and how are symptoms.
You're right that there is no way to fully transition over to cryptos in the current political state. That would require the government giving up massive amounts of power, and that is not were we are. I don't think they will regulate it much however. I think fiat, and cyptos will co-exist.
Governments treat crypto as just another commodity, so I don’t think they’ll have a problem in that regard.
Your mention of regulation triggered a thought - what if they treat crypto markets as casinos?
Well that would lead to a number of dangerous restrictions.... I hope that doesn't happen.
This post has received a 1.56 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @banjo.
@originalworks
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @penston to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!