dear Piotr,
golos.io already tried to implement 50-50 schema. to be brief: it didnt bring in any desired improvements, but instead (together with some other reasons) just spoiled and ruined down the value for Golos tokens. shit remains shit, whenever you name it.
Investors will be rewarded for doing really nothing, but pretty much for holding their STEEM (and auto-upvoting any kind of content).
I never upvote automatically, always manually and check the post (that doesnt mean I automatically read all the longreads, tho). (well, except the qurator posts). I am quite new to steemit, and to whole blockhain deal, but already figured out how important a good curation is, and how much steemit turned into a platform where only bots talk to you, and how much you need to play engagement games to grow, and
this new algorythm means more shit!
who need it, I wonder? probably the ones who are in it for the money, who want just to implemet a New Order to simplify moneymaking with their Giant Stacks. maybe steemit dont need 'authors' and 'content' after all? well, a few more iterations like this, and authors will off. thats for sure. no creator (unless he's a creator, not a soulless content shit-generator) wanna deal this shit. its just a humiliation.
Dear @qwerrie
Thank you for accepting my invitation.
I realized just now that I never actually thanked you for your amazing comment. I appreciate your time :)
That's something I never knew. Thanks for sharing. When did they introduce this 50/50 schema?
Have a great monday.
Piotr
golos.io had a lot of other problems (users gaming the system, hacking its weaknesses etc). you may find intresting this text (its in russian, hope that will not be a big problem).@crypto.piotr,
as for the 50-50 reward.schema, if i understand it correctly, it was rolled out in HF19 in december 2018 (more details, in russian)
i dont think my comments are that great / informative.. but at least they are emotional ;)
ps. have you seen this article? sounds optimistic!