To be fair, I don't see @slowwalker powering down, he manually curates, he votes my resteems sometimes, giving newbies a nice boost, doesn't use bot's, his grasp of English is far from perfect yet he posts in English, his content is not spectacular but original as is the photography.
His passion seems to be Temple's, their history and I feel it's genuine. Is everyone simply looking at his big rewards and not all these other factors?
He's may not be the perfect stereotype some of us want to envisage, but I can think of other's who are taking the piss far more than he does.
Is there something I'm missing?
I'm missing the point of what he's entitled to...
In your mind he's entitled to have his posts over-valued because he enriches your experience personally, along with some others. Does this entitlement also extend to retaliating on unrelated posts?
I suspect it's a little personal by this stage. We all have to make our choices.
Therein lies the problem. We let bullies define the rules of engagement on STEEM.