Lol they have all the right to do so..... That's how steemit was built.... Otherwise you won't have been able to have above a certain amount of steem... Because of that, and if I had a million bucs... It's very well my own damn business and my own damn choice where I would spend it... And besides I would have done the same if all the other big whales downvoted me.... Now matter how you play your cards.... Goodluck going against him.... Because the way it looks to me is all you suckers are losing xD xD xD hahaha lols!!!!.... And BTW I'm not going to read that whole paragraph which you wrote.... So Thnx for chipping into the conversation =).... And by the g@d d@mn way..... Go check all the positive comments on his posts, then you have the audacity to say that he doesn't have people voting on him... But that the majority are downvoting him... Oh please brother...
And besides any other points made that might be true or false....
WHY HAVENTT THE STEEMIT DEVELOPERS PUT A STOP TO IT, OR ATLEAST DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE "PROBLEM"..... BECAUSE IT'S ALLOWED.....
????????
THAT'S LIKE ME BUYING A SUPERCOMPUTER AND HAVING 90% OF THE HASH RATES ON THE BITCOIN BLOCKCHAIN... HENCEFORTH GETTING 90% OF ALL BITCOINS MINED.... WOULD YOU GUYS ALSO PUT UP A FUZZ??????
For once, I really thought you had a genuine opinion.
But it is.... It's genuinely my opinion
The difference is that in mining bitcoin, you are a producer. When you accept rewards from Steem, you are a consumer. The rewards were produced long before you, I or haejin ever got here and if we left they would remain the same.
We all have a responsibility in deciding how those rewards are consumed. It is perfectly ok to downvote based on reward value. That is built into the design of steem to stop this exact scenario.
Jesus who are you
@moeknows
If one pool controlled about nore than 50% of the hashing power in bitcoin it would go though a huge hardfork or dox/petition tge perosn to give up the pool look what happened ghash.io
I see thnx
If you looked into the issue, read posts by an original developer @dan, you can't easily fix the issue.
The fact that you refuse to read my answers means you do not care about anything other than your own opinion. You only care about your @BiasNarrative and have absolutely no say in this conversation.
Have fun.
Lol and you have all the say? Ask yourself this if you had so much steem power... Wouldn't you also upvote yourself and put out 10 posts a day?... And if that answer is no, then well my friend you are not human... Because everyone wants to make money, and if I or any other person had that ability to do so, we would without second thought..... But obviously ignorance is bliss
And you are correct I have not gone into any research, I'm just stating my point of view from what I see is happening.... Because even if haejin's stops his self upvoting and ranco..... Everyone against him will still continue to downvote him, and then how should he fair against the other whales, if you understand what I'm trying to say....
I do fully understand your point of view and that all the facts are there, but dude come on haejin didn't start this?
There are multiple whales on this platform with millions of Stem that do not up vote themselves. They actually make CURATION rewards.
Some make 400 SP a day by up voting users.
The other whales aren't up voting somebody up to extreme amounts. There is NO comparison. Find me another whale or another user that makes as much as him? Especially one who makes that much, with 95% coming from ONE person.
I don't think YOU understand what is going on. IF the abuse stopped, the flags would stop.
The flags stopped during the "truce." And what happened, Haejin still got 4.7% of the reward pool before flagging.
How about you research before spewing your opinion that has no information on what the background of the issue is. Your UNEDUCATED opinion is not welcome. If you can however, educate yourself and come back with logical explanations as to why I shouldn't care, I will 100% listen to you.
So far, I have seen none of this.
Also, as to your Bitcoin idea, when bitcoin becomes centralized, such as controlling 90% of the hashrate, people would drop bitcoin because if you have 51% of the hashrate, there is an attack called the 51% attack which basically allows you to control the tx's on the platform.
I don't think you understand the technical aspects of how blockchains work and WHY people use them and like them.
I really recommend you doing some research. Regardless of what you opinion turns out to be in the end.
If it is the same, good for you.
Until then, have fun trolling and giving nothing to Steem, yourself, or society.
cool Thnx bud... Only 1 thing remains standing, Heajin is going to win and you guys are all wasting your time xD... because whats happening now is definatly going to stay the same....
1 more thing... stop thinking that you are smarter than the next person... You dont know what I do for a living or what I contribute to society or to myself. But if you really want to be a douchebag about it, be my guest.. it just proves who you are as a person.
But as for me, I will continue taking Haejin's advice seeing that my portfolio has only grew since that day.
Thank You @biasnarrative. The best of luck to you and your family.
AND KEEP HODLING
Rough, that 100% downvote on a no monetary comment, I know this makes no sense. But, have a bigger up vote from me for it haha.
Just petty.
ah shit dude i see whats happening though
Always HODL. We can always agree on that haha.