Part of @steemcleaners agreement with STINC is that they can't use that stake to upvote. I mean, you can't argue against the lender who set those terms.
Hmmm, if that's the case, why isn't their voting power at 100%?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Check their downvote power. It's at 5%.
When you go below that, it starts to use your normal VP under HF 21/22.
If you are talking about the rando upvote. That probably shouldn't have happened. But, that's their internal affair. Not ours.
Ok, thanks for the explanation!
What do you think about a bid-bot being @steemcleaners 2nd highest upvote supporter?
I'm pretty sure that's a "curation sniper".
Many people vote early on SC posts because they know @adm will upvote it eventually, which yields curation greater than their vote value.
Since the HF21, bots have been doing some "manual" curating or change their algorithm to cover the loss of sales.
Thanks for all the info. I wasn't aware that people could do this. I'm just trying to get my bearings so I can play this (steemit) game more efficiently.