So in 2 minutes you read all of that and considered it not to mean undermining steem power?
Then could you please define what it means to undermine steem power?
Then I can understand and so can others, what it means to undermine steem power, as clearly I believe that holding a massive stake of steem and voting purely to antagonize people in a gestural manner while saying that he only votes with 1% for stuff he doesn't see, where that is a blatant lie:
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
Images were hidden due to low ratings.
Voting is expressed by adding options to transactions and signing those transactions.
Users cannot undermine STEEM Power by signing transactions.
STEEM Power can only be undermined by changing consensus.
You cannot shoehorn your little dispute into this situation.
If it did, I would classify it under "non-essential." Which means I wouldn't mind if a witness had a position on it or not.