RE: LOW-LIFE DOWNVOTING MEMBERS

[baah]

This twat literally logged onto a place he considered as a Cesspool to remark on what someone they grouped together with "low life scum" voted for, and they have the nerve to say that no normal person would vote like that, as if the reader is oblivious to the insulting tripe that implicates those in "control" of steem as pedophiles and 'other such low life scum'. Fucking retards and hypocrites. What normal person doesn't think : let me check in on this cesspool of pedophiles just one more time and obsess over what others are doing, because I'm not completely retarded.

Comments

[logiczombie]

I think the point here is that if simple name-calling is a "crime" then all name-calling should be downvoted.

And on the other hand, if there "are-no-rules" and "might-makes-right", then JUST SAY THAT and stop pretending downvotes are "justified".

[logiczombie]

While I tend to agree with you on this particular point, I do think it's important to maintain at least some tacit pretense of Uniform Standards of Evidence (USOE) regarding what constitutes a "violation".

[logiczombie]

More specifically they're denying calling morky and or boldawall SPECIFICALLY offensive names.

It wasn't presented as a specific accusation of a specific crime. It was a general insult.

For example, when Jesus threw the money-changers out of the temple, he called them "a den of thieves", generally.

He didn't single any specific person out and charge them with a specific, literal, actual, legal crime.

[logiczombie]

While that statement itself may or may not have any basis in fact, it does not in any way suggest that a specific employee, manager, director or shareholder of the company is directly or personally responsible for the exploitation of the company's employees, even if such exploitation is true.

Well stated.

[logiczombie]

I'm pretty sure that was a below minimum payout vote.