Sort:  
 5 years ago  Reveal Comment

While I tend to agree with you on this particular point, I do think it's important to maintain at least some tacit pretense of Uniform Standards of Evidence (USOE) regarding what constitutes a "violation".

More specifically they're denying calling morky and or boldawall SPECIFICALLY offensive names.

It wasn't presented as a specific accusation of a specific crime. It was a general insult.

For example, when Jesus threw the money-changers out of the temple, he called them "a den of thieves", generally.

He didn't single any specific person out and charge them with a specific, literal, actual, legal crime.

While that statement itself may or may not have any basis in fact, it does not in any way suggest that a specific employee, manager, director or shareholder of the company is directly or personally responsible for the exploitation of the company's employees, even if such exploitation is true.

Well stated.

 5 years ago  Reveal Comment

I'm pretty sure that was a below minimum payout vote.