Sort:  


This fiasco you colluders have done over the lifespan of steemit is despicable.You can add me to the list as well @berniesanders - I as well flagged this post.

If all you are going to do with your steempower is to upvote yourself and your sockpuppets, then ... Well I wont say what is on my mind, you should all be ashamed of yourself.

It is immoral, it is unethical and what you bad whales do completely lack business-sense. Break down, Confess and Repent from your sins!

#istandwithdan #istandwithned #istandwithsteemitinc #wewin

hey berniesanders upvoted me 1 time ... maybe twice? so perhaps he doesn't just vote his own sockpuppets? :)

Take a look at my votes and you'll see the real story. Plenty of claims here with 0 data to back them up even though it's readily available on the blockchain. @curie does 99% of my voting with 0 input from me.

i do, i always see you voting on a bunch of peeps stuff! :)

I did take a look at your voting after I read this comment and I just saw this post and @barrydutton's comment and I have to admit that I really thought @ozchartart was @berniesanders or there was at least collusion. After reading all this, I will no longer flag @ozchartart. I don't think you are profiting off of these posts except for the curation reward of course and honestly if you are, after all the other voting you do, I don't even care. I think these flag wars are bad for Steemit. If we are going to use flags this way, we should call them downvotes and we should always consider if someone has found the content valuable.

I know he doesn't. He has voted pretty consistently on my posts and even resteemed one of them. I'm grateful for his support and think he does a great job of curating a lot of authors to help out the community.

yes he does support a wide variety if you take the time to notice!
and also thanks @berniesanders for past support !

Flagged as trolling. As Dan indicated to you on the other post, you can express your views without attacking people and name calling. I would say the same to Dan, but your hostility is even worse.

Well @smooth & @berniesanders - I am from a place of pure raw talk and raw violence, as you may know. So I am new to all this "non aggression principle" you seem to try to practice around here and I am open to learn.

Should we start a blank page and progress, or should we keep filling up the phonebook of accusations from the past?

The last war I was in had casualties on both sides (real life) - so I am all for peace if we can have it - and from what I see the two of you are what is standing stubbornly against peace and causing all this friction, so my question to you two is - will you come to the roundtable or do you want to keep going in the same direction?

I can't speak for anyone else but I personally have no ongoing conflict with you and I'm happy to discuss anything with you or anyone at any time on steemit.chat, as I have in the past.

I am not trolling, so you can unflag it. I really mean it - you included should in company with the other collusion whales be ashamed of your actions.

Don´t you think we have a copy of every bad things you guys have said about everyone on rocket.chat and other places?

Your Power-Abusive behaviour is the problem - how come you do not understand that King Smooth and King NextGenCrypto etc etc...?

Not Trolling!

You're flaming quite often. Clearly. This has to be pointed out from time to time even when I can't pick a side in a specific conflict.

If you've got a copy, please share it. Don't just talk your usual talk to get everyone riled up.

Likewise, but I think many would be interested in the things you've said compared to either @smooth or myself.

You apparently do not understand how to engage in a reasoned conversation without making attacks and false accusations.

you included should in company with the other collusion whales be ashamed of your actions

I don't know what language that is exactly but it looks vaguely like a false accusation and a personal attack against me.

Please learn to communicate without trolling and attacking people

The above is an instance of flaming in an attempt to win influence from anyone watching the conflict and has to be pointed out from time to time even when one can't easily pick a side or stance on a specific issue.